From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363826B0072 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:39:42 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n12so800776wgh.2 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:39:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (mail-we0-x234.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ep4si36809895wjd.163.2013.12.06.07.39.40 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:39:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id t61so811604wes.39 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:39:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1386018639-18916-1-git-send-email-wroberts@tresys.com> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 07:39:39 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] - auditing cmdline From: William Roberts Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: William Roberts Cc: "linux-audit@redhat.com" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "rgb@redhat.com" , "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" , "sds@tycho.nsa.gov" Sigh...I sent this back out from another emai address and got bounced from the lists... resending. Sorry for the cruft. On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:34 AM, William Roberts wrote= : > I sent out 3 patches on 12/2/2013. I didn't get any response. I thought I= added the right people based on get_maintainers script. > > Can anyone comment on these or point me in the right direction? > > RGB, Can you at least ACK the audit subsystem patch " audit: Audit proc c= mdline value"? > > Thank you, > Bill > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org [mailto:owner-linux-mm@kvack.org] On Behal= f Of William Roberts > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 1:11 PM > To: linux-audit@redhat.com; linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.= org; rgb@redhat.com; viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk > Cc: sds@tycho.nsa.gov > Subject: [PATCH] - auditing cmdline > > This patch series relates to work started on the audit mailing list. > It eventually involved touching other modules, so I am trying to pull in = those owners as well. In a nutshell I add new utility functions for accessi= ng a processes cmdline value as displayed in proc//cmdline, and then = refactor procfs to use the utility functions, and then add the ability to t= he audit subsystem to record this value. > > Thanks for any feedback and help. > > [PATCH 1/3] mm: Create utility functions for accessing a tasks > [PATCH 2/3] proc: Update get proc_pid_cmdline() to use mm.h helpers > [PATCH 3/3] audit: Audit proc cmdline value > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to= majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: email@kvack.org --=20 Respectfully, William C Roberts -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org