linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bujnak, Stepan" <stepan@pex.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	mcgrof@kernel.org,  hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/oom: added option 'oom_dump_task_cmdline'
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 09:37:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFZe2nQW3mUGgSVndzmPirz7BkVUCEyjt=hgxqFn=bntrCsC8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190220064939.GT4525@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 7:49 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed 20-02-19 04:22:45, Stepan Bujnak wrote:
> > When oom_dump_tasks is enabled, this option will try to display task
> > cmdline instead of the command name in the system-wide task dump.
> >
> > This is useful in some cases e.g. on postgres server. If OOM killer is
> > invoked it will show a bunch of tasks called 'postgres'. With this
> > option enabled it will show additional information like the database
> > user, database name and what it is currently doing.
> >
> > Other example is python. Instead of just 'python' it will also show the
> > script name currently being executed.
>
> The size of OOM report output is quite large already and this will just
> add much more for some workloads and printing from this context is quite
> a problem already.
>

The option defaults to false so most workloads wouldn't be affected.
As an alternative the cmdline line can only be printed for the
victim task in the OOM summary.

> > Signed-off-by: Stepan Bujnak <stepan@pex.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt | 10 ++++++++++
> >  include/linux/oom.h         |  1 +
> >  kernel/sysctl.c             |  7 +++++++
> >  mm/oom_kill.c               | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> >  4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> [...]
> > @@ -404,9 +406,18 @@ static void dump_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask)
> >       pr_info("[  pid  ]   uid  tgid total_vm      rss pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name\n");
> >       rcu_read_lock();
> >       for_each_process(p) {
> > +             char *name, *cmd = NULL;
> > +
> >               if (oom_unkillable_task(p, memcg, nodemask))
> >                       continue;
> >
> > +             /*
> > +              * This needs to be done before calling find_lock_task_mm()
> > +              * since both grab a task lock which would result in deadlock.
> > +              */
> > +             if (sysctl_oom_dump_task_cmdline)
> > +                     cmd = kstrdup_quotable_cmdline(p, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +
> >               task = find_lock_task_mm(p);
> >               if (!task) {
> >                       /*
> You are trying to allocate from the OOM context. That is a big no no.
> Not to mention that this is deadlock prone because get_cmdline needs
> mmap_sem and the allocating context migh hold the lock already. So the
> patch is simply wrong.
>

Thanks for the notes. I understand how allocating from OOM context
is a problem. However I still believe that this would be helpful
for debugging OOM kills since task->comm is often not descriptive
enough. Would it help if instead of calling kstrdup_quotable_cmdline()
which allocates the buffer on heap I called get_cmdline() directly
passing it stack-allocated buffer of certain size e.g. 256?

> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-20  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-20  3:22 Stepan Bujnak
2019-02-20  4:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-02-20  4:30   ` Bujnak, Stepan
2019-02-20  5:56     ` Randy Dunlap
2019-02-20  6:49 ` Michal Hocko
2019-02-20  8:37   ` Bujnak, Stepan [this message]
2019-02-20 10:00     ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-02-20 10:01     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFZe2nQW3mUGgSVndzmPirz7BkVUCEyjt=hgxqFn=bntrCsC8A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=stepan@pex.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox