From: David Finkel <davidf@vimeo.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
core-services@vimeo.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: cg2 memory{.swap,}.peak write handlers
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:20:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFUnj5PeQ-FefK+ja0BtwHZFF0QyJdN9imZQESOj+tRjHSmvow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZpanW41dQ8DimbA3@google.com>
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 1:01 PM Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 06:44:11AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 03:48:17PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > The removal of resets was intentional. The problem was that it wasn't clear
> > who owned those counters and there's no way of telling who reset what when.
> > It was easy to accidentally end up with multiple entities that think they
> > can get timed measurement by resetting.
> >
> > So, in general, I don't think this is a great idea. There are shortcomings
> > to how memory.peak behaves in that its meaningfulness quickly declines over
> > time. This is expected and the rationale behind adding memory.peak, IIRC,
> > was that it was difficult to tell the memory usage of a short-lived cgroup.
> >
> > If we want to allow peak measurement of time periods, I wonder whether we
> > could do something similar to pressure triggers - ie. let users register
> > watchers so that each user can define their own watch periods. This is more
> > involved but more useful and less error-inducing than adding reset to a
> > single counter.
>
> It's definitely a better user interface and I totally agree with you regarding
> the shortcomings of the proposed interface with a global reset. But if you let
> users to register a (potentially large) number of watchers, it might be quite
> bad for the overall performance, isn't it? To mitigate it, we'll need to reduce
> the accuracy of peak values. And then the question is why not just poll it
> periodically from userspace?
FWIW, as a stop-gap, we did implement periodic polling from userspace for
the system that motivated this change, but that is unlikely to catch
memory-usage
spikes that have shorter timescales than the polling interval. For
now, we're keeping
it on cgroups v1, but that's looking like a long-term untenable position.
Thanks,
--
David Finkel
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Core Services
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-16 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-15 20:36 David Finkel
2024-07-15 20:36 ` David Finkel
2024-07-15 20:42 ` David Finkel
2024-07-15 20:46 ` David Finkel
2024-07-16 7:20 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-16 12:47 ` David Finkel
2024-07-16 13:19 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-16 13:39 ` David Finkel
2024-07-16 13:48 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-16 13:54 ` David Finkel
2024-07-16 16:44 ` Tejun Heo
2024-07-16 17:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-07-16 17:20 ` David Finkel [this message]
2024-07-16 19:53 ` Tejun Heo
2024-07-16 17:10 ` David Finkel
2024-07-16 19:48 ` Tejun Heo
2024-07-16 20:18 ` David Finkel
2024-07-16 18:00 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-16 20:00 ` Tejun Heo
2024-07-16 22:06 ` David Finkel
2024-07-17 6:26 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-17 14:24 ` David Finkel
2024-07-17 15:46 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-17 6:23 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-17 17:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2024-07-17 20:14 ` David Finkel
2024-07-17 20:44 ` Johannes Weiner
2024-07-17 21:13 ` David Finkel
2024-07-17 23:48 ` Waiman Long
2024-07-18 1:24 ` Tejun Heo
2024-07-18 2:17 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-07-18 2:22 ` Waiman Long
2024-07-18 7:21 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-18 21:49 ` David Finkel
2024-07-19 3:23 ` Waiman Long
2024-07-22 15:18 ` David Finkel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-07-22 15:17 [PATCH] mm, memcg: cg2 memory{.swap,}.peak write handlers (fd-local edition) David Finkel
2024-07-22 15:17 ` [PATCH] mm, memcg: cg2 memory{.swap,}.peak write handlers David Finkel
2024-07-22 18:22 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-07-22 19:30 ` David Finkel
2024-07-22 19:47 ` Waiman Long
2024-07-22 23:06 ` David Finkel
2023-12-04 19:41 David Finkel
2023-12-04 23:33 ` Shakeel Butt
2023-12-05 9:07 ` Michal Hocko
2023-12-05 16:00 ` David Finkel
2023-12-06 8:45 ` Michal Hocko
2024-02-07 21:06 ` David Finkel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFUnj5PeQ-FefK+ja0BtwHZFF0QyJdN9imZQESOj+tRjHSmvow@mail.gmail.com \
--to=davidf@vimeo.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=core-services@vimeo.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox