From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from mail-ua0-f199.google.com (mail-ua0-f199.google.com [209.85.217.199])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3216B0005
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Mon,  2 Jul 2018 15:16:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-f199.google.com with SMTP id r6-v6so5512471uan.7
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 12:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65])
        by mx.google.com with SMTPS id b56-v6sor1904706uaa.65.2018.07.02.12.16.44
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>
        (Google Transport Security);
        Mon, 02 Jul 2018 12:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180629194117.01b2d31e805808eee5c97b4d@linux-foundation.org>
References: <cover.1530018818.git.andreyknvl@google.com> <20180627160800.3dc7f9ee41c0badbf7342520@linux-foundation.org>
 <CAAeHK+xz552VNpZxgWwU-hbTqF5_F6YVDw3fSv=4OT8mNrqPzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180628124039.8a42ab5e2994fb2876ff4f75@linux-foundation.org>
 <CAAeHK+xsBOKghUp9XhpfXGqU=gjSYuy3G2GH14zWNEmaLPy8_w@mail.gmail.com> <20180629194117.01b2d31e805808eee5c97b4d@linux-foundation.org>
From: Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:16:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFKCwrjxGEa6CLJnjmNy+92d2GSUkoymQ6Sm91CDpMZcJCcWCA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] khwasan: kernel hardware assisted address sanitizer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@google.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>, Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>, Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@arm.com>, Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>, Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>, Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Mark Brand <markbrand@google.com>, Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>

Looking at a live Android device under load, slab (according to
/proc/meminfo) + kernel stack take 8-10% available RAM (~350MB).
Kasan's overhead of 2x - 3x on top of it is not insignificant.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:41 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:45:08 +0200 Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> wrote:
>
>> >> What kind of memory consumption testing would you like to see?
>> >
>> > Well, 100kb or so is a teeny amount on virtually any machine.  I'm
>> > assuming the savings are (much) more significant once the machine gets
>> > loaded up and doing work?
>>
>> So with clean kernel after boot we get 40 kb memory usage. With KASAN
>> it is ~120 kb, which is 200% overhead. With KHWASAN it's 50 kb, which
>> is 25% overhead. This should approximately scale to any amounts of
>> used slab memory. For example with 100 mb memory usage we would get
>> +200 mb for KASAN and +25 mb with KHWASAN. (And KASAN also requires
>> quarantine for better use-after-free detection). I can explicitly
>> mention the overhead in %s in the changelog.
>>
>> If you think it makes sense, I can also make separate measurements
>> with some workload. What kind of workload should I use?
>
> Whatever workload people were running when they encountered problems
> with KASAN memory consumption ;)
>
> I dunno, something simple.  `find / > /dev/null'?
>