2018-01-17 9:19 GMT+08:00 Liubo(OS Lab) : > On 2018/1/17 5:30, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > I want to talk about status of HMM and respective upstream user for > > it and also talk about what's next in term of features/improvement > > plan (generic page write protection, mmu_notifier, ...). Most likely > > I don't think we should consider to push more code to upstream for a > nobody-use feature. > > AFAIR, Michal also mentioned that HMM need a real user/driver before > upstream. > But I haven't seen a workable user/driver version. > > Looks like HMM is a custom framework for Nvidia, and Nvidia would not like > to open source its driver. > Even if nvidia really use HMM and open sourced its driver, it's probably > the only user. > But the HMM framework touched too much core mm code. > HMM looks suitable for FPGA user case, FPGA and CPU need coherency. ~_~ > > Cheers, > Liubo > > > short 15-30minutes if mmu_notifier is split into its own topic. > > > > I want to talk about mmu_notifier, specificaly adding more context > > information to mmu_notifier callback (why a notification is happening > > reclaim, munmap, migrate, ...). Maybe we can grow this into its own > > topic and talk about mmu_notifier and issue with it like OOM or being > > able to sleep/take lock ... and improving mitigation. > > > > People (mmu_notifier probably interest a larger set): > > "Anshuman Khandual" > > "Balbir Singh" > > "David Rientjes" > > "John Hubbard" > > "Michal Hocko" > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: email@kvack.org >