linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	 oleg@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	 bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jolsa@kernel.org,  paulmck@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,  mjguzik@gmail.com,
	brauner@kernel.org, jannh@google.com, mhocko@kernel.org,
	 vbabka@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	 lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 tip/perf/core 2/4] mm: switch to 64-bit mm_lock_seq/vm_lock_seq on 64-bit architectures
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:12:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZxM2khxd0YNLT6STCvpNz+uqAgS0e8NmtbxcpPLJMvpQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241023190240.GA11151@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 12:02 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 07:01:59PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 12:56 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 01:56:42PM GMT, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > > To increase mm->mm_lock_seq robustness, switch it from int to long, so
> > > > that it's a 64-bit counter on 64-bit systems and we can stop worrying
> > > > about it wrapping around in just ~4 billion iterations. Same goes for
> > > > VMA's matching vm_lock_seq, which is derived from mm_lock_seq.
> >
> > vm_lock_seq does not need to be long but for consistency I guess that
> > makes sense. While at it, can you please change these seq counters to
> > be unsigned?
>
> Yeah, that. Kees is waging war on signed types that 'overflow'. These
> sequence counter thingies are designed to wrap and should very much be
> unsigned.

Ah, ok, I already forgot I need to update this. Will do.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-23 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-10 20:56 [PATCH v3 tip/perf/core 0/4] uprobes,mm: speculative lockless VMA-to-uprobe lookup Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-10 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 tip/perf/core 1/4] mm: introduce mmap_lock_speculation_{start|end} Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-13  7:56   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-14 20:27     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-14 20:48       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-10-23 20:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-23 22:17     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-10-24  9:56       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-24 16:28         ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-10-24 21:04           ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-10-24 23:20             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-24 23:33               ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-10-25  5:12                 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-10 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 tip/perf/core 2/4] mm: switch to 64-bit mm_lock_seq/vm_lock_seq on 64-bit architectures Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-13  7:56   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-10-17  2:01     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-10-17 18:55       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-17 19:42         ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-10-17 20:12           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-23 19:02       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-23 19:12         ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2024-10-23 19:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-10 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 tip/perf/core 3/4] uprobes: simplify find_active_uprobe_rcu() VMA checks Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-10 20:56 ` [PATCH v3 tip/perf/core 4/4] uprobes: add speculative lockless VMA-to-inode-to-uprobe resolution Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-11  5:01   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-10-23 19:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-23 20:02     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-23 20:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-23 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 tip/perf/core 0/4] uprobes,mm: speculative lockless VMA-to-uprobe lookup Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAEf4BzZxM2khxd0YNLT6STCvpNz+uqAgS0e8NmtbxcpPLJMvpQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox