linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	 Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Carmen Jackson <carmenjackson@google.com>,
	Mayank Gupta <mayankgupta@google.com>,
	 Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	kernel-team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	 Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: emit tracepoint when RSS changes by threshold
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 10:43:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEe=SxmG4oUBUu88NNyOhPC5weExf=UCzLy_pzwg3+CruqO4Cw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190905133507.783c6c61@oasis.local.home>

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:03 AM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
> I might misunderstand this but is the issue here actually throttling
> of the sheer number of trace records or tracing large enough changes
> to RSS that user might care about? Small changes happen all the time
> but we are likely not interested in those. Surely we could postprocess
> the traces to extract changes large enough to be interesting but why
> capture uninteresting information in the first place? IOW the
> throttling here should be based not on the time between traces but on
> the amount of change of the traced signal. Maybe a generic facility
> like that would be a good idea?

You want two properties from the tracepoint:

- Small fluctuations in the value don't flood the trace buffer. If you
get a new trace event from a process every time kswapd reclaims a
single page from that process, you're going to need an enormous trace
buffer that will have significant side effects on overall system
performance.
- Any spike in memory consumption gets a trace event, regardless of
the duration of that spike. This tracepoint has been incredibly useful
in both understanding the causes of kswapd wakeups and
lowmemorykiller/lmkd kills and evaluating the impact of memory
management changes because it guarantees that any spike appears in the
trace output.

As a result, the RSS tracepoint in particular needs to be throttled
based on the delta of the value, not time. The very first prototype of
the patch emitted a trace event per RSS counter change, and IIRC the
RSS trace events consumed significantly more room in the buffer than
sched_switch (and Android has a lot of sched_switch events). It's not
practical to trace changes in RSS without throttling. If there's a
generic throttling approach that would work here, I'm all for it; like
Dan mentioned, there are many more counters that we would like to
trace in a similar way.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-05 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-03 20:09 Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-09-04  4:44 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-09-04  4:51   ` Daniel Colascione
2019-09-04  5:15     ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-04  5:42       ` Daniel Colascione
2019-09-04 14:59         ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-04 17:15           ` Daniel Colascione
2019-09-04 23:59             ` sspatil
2019-09-04  5:02   ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-04  5:38     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-09-04  8:45 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-04 15:32   ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-04 15:37     ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-04 16:28       ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-05 10:54         ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-05 14:14           ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-05 14:20             ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-05 14:23               ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-05 14:43         ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-05 16:03           ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-09-05 17:35             ` Steven Rostedt
2019-09-05 17:39               ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-09-05 17:43               ` Tim Murray [this message]
2019-09-05 17:47               ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-05 17:51                 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-05 19:56                   ` Tom Zanussi
2019-09-05 20:24                     ` Daniel Colascione
2019-09-05 20:32                       ` Tom Zanussi
2019-09-05 21:14                       ` Tom Zanussi
2019-09-05 22:12                         ` Daniel Colascione
2019-09-05 22:51                           ` Daniel Colascione
2019-09-05 17:50               ` Daniel Colascione
2019-09-06  0:59                 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-06  1:15                   ` Daniel Colascione
2019-09-06  3:01                     ` Joel Fernandes
2019-09-04 17:17       ` Daniel Colascione

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEe=SxmG4oUBUu88NNyOhPC5weExf=UCzLy_pzwg3+CruqO4Cw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=timmurray@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=carmenjackson@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dancol@google.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mayankgupta@google.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox