linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: "Laura Abbott" <labbott@redhat.com>,
	alex.popov@linux.com, "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
	"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
	"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
	"Christian Brauner" <christian@brauner.io>,
	"Riley Andrews" <riandrews@android.com>,
	driverdevel <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
	<linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Brian Starkey" <brian.starkey@arm.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
	"Andrey Konovalov" <andreyknvl@google.com>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
	"Hridya Valsaraju" <hridya@google.com>,
	"Alistair Delva" <adelva@google.com>,
	"Chenbo Feng" <fengc@google.com>,
	"Erick Reyes" <erickreyes@google.com>
Subject: Re: Limits for ION Memory Allocator
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 07:45:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YQFKhfS=2-LkkDkSg_1XzWh9WUa__nWjqxL0Uts9yyDdg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLU0VUp=PGx5=JuVp6c5gwLqpSZJxs7ieL631QhdzNQTyA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:24 PM John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:18 PM John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:36 PM Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 7/17/19 12:31 PM, Alexander Popov wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > The syzkaller [1] has a trouble with fuzzing the Linux kernel with ION Memory
> > > > Allocator.
> > > >
> > > > Syzkaller uses several methods [2] to limit memory consumption of the userspace
> > > > processes calling the syscalls for testing the kernel:
> > > >   - setrlimit(),
> > > >   - cgroups,
> > > >   - various sysctl.
> > > > But these methods don't work for ION Memory Allocator, so any userspace process
> > > > that has access to /dev/ion can bring the system to the out-of-memory state.
> > > >
> > > > An example of a program doing that:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #include <sys/types.h>
> > > > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > > > #include <fcntl.h>
> > > > #include <stdio.h>
> > > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > > > #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> > > >
> > > > #define ION_IOC_MAGIC         'I'
> > > > #define ION_IOC_ALLOC         _IOWR(ION_IOC_MAGIC, 0, \
> > > >                                     struct ion_allocation_data)
> > > >
> > > > struct ion_allocation_data {
> > > >       __u64 len;
> > > >       __u32 heap_id_mask;
> > > >       __u32 flags;
> > > >       __u32 fd;
> > > >       __u32 unused;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > int main(void)
> > > > {
> > > >       unsigned long i = 0;
> > > >       int fd = -1;
> > > >       struct ion_allocation_data data = {
> > > >               .len = 0x13f65d8c,
> > > >               .heap_id_mask = 1,
> > > >               .flags = 0,
> > > >               .fd = -1,
> > > >               .unused = 0
> > > >       };
> > > >
> > > >       fd = open("/dev/ion", 0);
> > > >       if (fd == -1) {
> > > >               perror("[-] open /dev/ion");
> > > >               return 1;
> > > >       }
> > > >
> > > >       while (1) {
> > > >               printf("iter %lu\n", i);
> > > >               ioctl(fd, ION_IOC_ALLOC, &data);
> > > >               i++;
> > > >       }
> > > >
> > > >       return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I looked through the code of ion_alloc() and didn't find any limit checks.
> > > > Is it currently possible to limit ION kernel allocations for some process?
> > > >
> > > > If not, is it a right idea to do that?
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, I do think that's the right approach. We're working on moving Ion
> > > out of staging and this is something I mentioned to John Stultz. I don't
> > > think we've thought too hard about how to do the actual limiting so
> > > suggestions are welcome.
> >
> > In part the dmabuf heaps allow for separate heap devices, so we can
> > have finer grained permissions to the specific heaps.  But that
> > doesn't provide any controls on how much memory one process could
> > allocate using the device if it has permission.
> >
> > I suspect the same issue is present with any of the dmabuf exporters
> > (gpu/display drivers, etc), so this is less of an ION/dmabuf heap
> > issue and more of a dmabuf core accounting issue.
> >
>
> Also, do unmapped memfd buffers have similar accounting issues?
>

The syzcaller bot didn't complain about this for memfd yet, so I suspect not ;-)

With memfd since it uses shmem underneath, __vm_enough_memory() is
called during shmem_acct_block() which should take per-process memory
into account already and fail if there is not enough memory.

Should ION be doing something similar to fail if there's not enough memory?

thanks,

- Joel


      reply	other threads:[~2019-07-26 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-17 16:31 Alexander Popov
2019-07-24 19:36 ` Laura Abbott
2019-07-24 20:18   ` John Stultz
2019-07-24 20:23     ` John Stultz
2019-07-26 11:45       ` Joel Fernandes [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEXW_YQFKhfS=2-LkkDkSg_1XzWh9WUa__nWjqxL0Uts9yyDdg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=adelva@google.com \
    --cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=brian.starkey@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=erickreyes@google.com \
    --cc=fengc@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hridya@google.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maco@android.com \
    --cc=riandrews@android.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox