From: Kuo-Hsin Yang <vovoy@chromium.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm, drm/i915: mark pinned shmemfs pages as unevictable
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 19:24:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEHM+4oR7tRv5qwKxKjRCQVHF75MnPmb3PdXtU7Ve0hj+G+tjg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b114017f-edeb-2055-1313-0d7821d633ae@intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:05 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
> On 11/2/18 6:22 AM, Vovo Yang wrote:
> > Chris helped to answer this question:
> > Though it includes a few non-shmemfs objects, see
> > debugfs/dri/0/i915_gem_objects and the "bound objects".
> >
> > Example i915_gem_object output:
> > 591 objects, 95449088 bytes
> > 55 unbound objects, 1880064 bytes
> > 533 bound objects, 93040640 bytes
>
> Do those non-shmemfs objects show up on the unevictable list? How far
> can the amount of memory on the unevictable list and the amount
> displayed in this "bound objects" value diverge?
Those non-shmemfs objects would not show up on the unevictable list.
On typical use case, The size of gtt bounded objects (in unevictable
list) is very close to the bound size in i915_gem_objects. E.g. on my
laptop: i915_gem_object shows 110075904 bytes bounded objects, and
there are 109760512 bytes gtt bounded objects, the difference is about
0.3%.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-05 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-31 8:19 Kuo-Hsin Yang
2018-10-31 9:41 ` Chris Wilson
2018-10-31 10:42 ` Vovo Yang
2018-11-01 12:20 ` Chris Wilson
2018-10-31 14:19 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-01 12:06 ` Vovo Yang
2018-11-01 14:30 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-02 13:22 ` Vovo Yang
2018-11-02 14:05 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-05 11:24 ` Kuo-Hsin Yang [this message]
2018-10-31 14:24 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-31 14:40 ` Dave Hansen
2018-10-31 16:42 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-01 11:28 ` Vovo Yang
2018-11-01 13:09 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-02 12:35 ` Vovo Yang
2018-11-02 18:26 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEHM+4oR7tRv5qwKxKjRCQVHF75MnPmb3PdXtU7Ve0hj+G+tjg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vovoy@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox