linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yunhui cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	 Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	 Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Ved Shanbhogue <ved@rivosinc.com>, Matt Evans <mev@rivosinc.com>,
	Dylan Jhong <dylan@andestech.com>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [External] [PATCH RFC/RFT v2 4/4] riscv: Stop emitting preventive sfence.vma for new userspace mappings with Svvptc
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 17:35:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEEQ3wnmCr5NTEFo3wTN_zWse2DPkE6ieVUk_=Vv7A-UzDCCvQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131155929.169961-5-alexghiti@rivosinc.com>

Hi Alex,

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 12:04 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> The preventive sfence.vma were emitted because new mappings must be made
> visible to the page table walker but Svvptc guarantees that xRET act as
> a fence, so no need to sfence.vma for the uarchs that implement this
> extension.
>
> This allows to drastically reduce the number of sfence.vma emitted:
>
> * Ubuntu boot to login:
> Before: ~630k sfence.vma
> After:  ~200k sfence.vma
>
> * ltp - mmapstress01
> Before: ~45k
> After:  ~6.3k
>
> * lmbench - lat_pagefault
> Before: ~665k
> After:   832 (!)
>
> * lmbench - lat_mmap
> Before: ~546k
> After:   718 (!)
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>  arch/riscv/mm/pgtable.c          | 13 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 0c94260b5d0c..50986e4c4601 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -473,6 +473,9 @@ static inline void update_mmu_cache_range(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>                 struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>                 pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr)
>  {
> +       asm_volatile_goto(ALTERNATIVE("nop", "j %l[svvptc]", 0, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVVPTC, 1)
> +                         : : : : svvptc);
> +
>         /*
>          * The kernel assumes that TLBs don't cache invalid entries, but
>          * in RISC-V, SFENCE.VMA specifies an ordering constraint, not a
> @@ -482,12 +485,23 @@ static inline void update_mmu_cache_range(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>          */
>         while (nr--)
>                 local_flush_tlb_page(address + nr * PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +svvptc:
> +       /*
> +        * Svvptc guarantees that xRET act as a fence, so when the uarch does
> +        * not cache invalid entries, we don't have to do anything.
> +        */
> +       ;
>  }

From the perspective of RISC-V arch, the logic of this patch is
reasonable. The code of mm comm submodule may be missing
update_mmu_cache_range(), for example: there is no flush TLB in
remap_pte_range() after updating pte.
I will send a patch to mm/ to fix this problem next.


Thanks,
Yunhui


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-30  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-31 15:59 [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] Svvptc extension to remove preventive sfence.vma Alexandre Ghiti
2024-01-31 15:59 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v2 1/4] riscv: Add ISA extension parsing for Svvptc Alexandre Ghiti
2024-01-31 15:59 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v2 2/4] dt-bindings: riscv: Add Svvptc ISA extension description Alexandre Ghiti
2024-02-01  9:22   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-31 15:59 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v2 3/4] riscv: Stop emitting preventive sfence.vma for new vmalloc mappings Alexandre Ghiti
2024-06-03  2:26   ` [External] " yunhui cui
2024-06-03 12:02     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-06-04  6:21       ` yunhui cui
2024-06-04  7:15         ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-06-04  7:17           ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-06-04  8:51             ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-04 11:44               ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-06-04 20:17                 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-31 15:59 ` [PATCH RFC/RFT v2 4/4] riscv: Stop emitting preventive sfence.vma for new userspace mappings with Svvptc Alexandre Ghiti
2024-02-01 15:03   ` Andrea Parri
2024-02-02 15:42     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-02-02 22:05       ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-05-30  9:35   ` yunhui cui [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEEQ3wnmCr5NTEFo3wTN_zWse2DPkE6ieVUk_=Vv7A-UzDCCvQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=cuiyunhui@bytedance.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dylan@andestech.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mev@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=ved@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox