Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, nobootmem: fix wrong usage of max_low_pfn

[Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> wrote:
> max_low_pfn reflect the number of _pages_ in the system,
> not the maximum PFN. You can easily find that fact in init_bootmem().
> So fix it.

I'm confused. for x86, we have max_low_pfn defined in ...

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
        /* max_low_pfn get updated here */
        find_low_pfn_range();
#else
        num_physpages = max_pfn;

        check_x2apic();

        /* How many end-of-memory variables you have, grandma! */
        /* need this before calling reserve_initrd */
        if (max_pfn > (1UL<<(32 - PAGE_SHIFT)))
                max_low_pfn = e820_end_of_low_ram_pfn();
        else
                max_low_pfn = max_pfn;

and under max_low_pfn is bootmem.

>
> Additionally, if 'start_pfn == end_pfn', we don't need to go futher,
> so change range check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> diff --git a/mm/nobootmem.c b/mm/nobootmem.c
> index 5e07d36..4711e91 100644
> --- a/mm/nobootmem.c
> +++ b/mm/nobootmem.c
> @@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ static unsigned long __init __free_memory_core(phys_addr_t start,
>  {
>         unsigned long start_pfn = PFN_UP(start);
>         unsigned long end_pfn = min_t(unsigned long,
> -                                     PFN_DOWN(end), max_low_pfn);
> +                                     PFN_DOWN(end), min_low_pfn);

what is min_low_pfn ?  is it 0 for x86?

Thanks

Yinghai

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>