linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memblock, numa: Binary search node id
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:15:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUYccFLzfHcjx+cgLky0UH8h99msDsNdAR7WdLpzwFQ2A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130816190106.GD22182@sgi.com>

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 01:43:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 22:46:29 -0700 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Current early_pfn_to_nid() on arch that support memblock go
>> > over memblock.memory one by one, so will take too many try
>> > near the end.
>> >
>> > We can use existing memblock_search to find the node id for
>> > given pfn, that could save some time on bigger system that
>> > have many entries memblock.memory array.
>>
>> Looks nice.  I wonder how much difference it makes.
>
> Here are the timing differences for several machines.
> In each case with the patch less time was spent in __early_pfn_to_nid().
>
>
>                         3.11-rc5        with patch      difference (%)
>                         --------        ----------      --------------
> UV1: 256 nodes  9TB:     411.66          402.47         -9.19 (2.23%)
> UV2: 255 nodes 16TB:    1141.02         1138.12         -2.90 (0.25%)
> UV2:  64 nodes  2TB:     128.15          126.53         -1.62 (1.26%)
> UV2:  32 nodes  2TB:     121.87          121.07         -0.80 (0.66%)
>                         Time in seconds.
>

Thanks.

9T one have more entries in memblock.memory?

Yinghai

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-16 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-15  5:46 Yinghai Lu
2013-08-15 20:43 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-15 21:06   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-15 21:37     ` Russ Anderson
2013-08-16 19:01   ` Russ Anderson
2013-08-16 19:15     ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2013-08-16 19:31       ` Russ Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAE9FiQUYccFLzfHcjx+cgLky0UH8h99msDsNdAR7WdLpzwFQ2A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rja@sgi.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox