From: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com>
To: andreyknvl@gmail.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, bp@alien8.de, brauner@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
dvyukov@google.com, glider@google.com, hpa@zytor.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@redhat.com, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm: x86: instrument __get/__put_kernel_nofault
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:09:33 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACzwLxg7_HPxbjLT1v+dHG=V0wAcUJYZvqdcdLBD9xhLgNUmqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240922145757.986887-1-snovitoll@gmail.com>
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 7:57 PM Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
<snovitoll@gmail.com> wrote:
> arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 3 +++
> mm/kasan/kasan_test.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 3a7755c1a441..e8e5185dd65c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -620,6 +620,7 @@ do { \
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT
> #define __get_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label) \
> + instrument_memcpy_before(dst, src, sizeof(type)); \
> __get_user_size(*((type *)(dst)), (__force type __user *)(src), \
> sizeof(type), err_label)
> #else // !CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT
> @@ -627,6 +628,7 @@ do { \
> do { \
> int __kr_err; \
> \
> + instrument_memcpy_before(dst, src, sizeof(type)); \
> __get_user_size(*((type *)(dst)), (__force type __user *)(src), \
> sizeof(type), __kr_err); \
> if (unlikely(__kr_err)) \
> @@ -635,6 +637,7 @@ do { \
> #endif // CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT
>
> #define __put_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label) \
> + instrument_write(dst, sizeof(type)); \
> __put_user_size(*((type *)(src)), (__force type __user *)(dst), \
> sizeof(type), err_label)
>
Instead of adding KASAN, KCSAN checks per arch macro,
here is the alternative, generic way with a wrapper.
I've tested it on x86_64 only, going to test on arm64
with KASAN_SW_TAGS, KASAN_HW_TAGS if I can do it in qemu,
and form a new patch for all arch
and this PATCH v5 for x86 only can be abandoned.
Please let me know if this wrapper is good enough,
I will see in kasan_test.c how I should use SW/HW_TAG, probably,
they should be a separate test with
KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS);
---
include/linux/uaccess.h | 8 ++++++++
mm/kasan/kasan_test.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
mm/maccess.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
index d8e4105a2f21..1b5c23868f97 100644
--- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
+++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
@@ -422,6 +422,14 @@ do { \
} while (0)
#endif
+#define __get_kernel_nofault_wrapper(dst, src, type, err_label) \
+ instrument_memcpy_before(dst, src, sizeof(type)); \
+ __get_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label); \
+
+#define __put_kernel_nofault_wrapper(dst, src, type, err_label) \
+ instrument_write(dst, sizeof(type)); \
+ __put_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label); \
+
/**
* get_kernel_nofault(): safely attempt to read from a location
* @val: read into this variable
diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c b/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c
index 567d33b493e2..ae05c8858c07 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c
@@ -1944,6 +1944,26 @@ static void match_all_mem_tag(struct kunit *test)
kfree(ptr);
}
+static void copy_from_to_kernel_nofault_oob(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ char *ptr;
+ char buf[128];
+ size_t size = sizeof(buf);
+
+ ptr = kmalloc(size - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
+ copy_from_kernel_nofault(&buf[0], ptr, size));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
+ copy_from_kernel_nofault(ptr, &buf[0], size));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
+ copy_to_kernel_nofault(&buf[0], ptr, size));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
+ copy_to_kernel_nofault(ptr, &buf[0], size));
+ kfree(ptr);
+}
+
static struct kunit_case kasan_kunit_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(kmalloc_oob_right),
KUNIT_CASE(kmalloc_oob_left),
@@ -2017,6 +2037,7 @@ static struct kunit_case kasan_kunit_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(match_all_not_assigned),
KUNIT_CASE(match_all_ptr_tag),
KUNIT_CASE(match_all_mem_tag),
+ KUNIT_CASE(copy_from_to_kernel_nofault_oob),
{}
};
diff --git a/mm/maccess.c b/mm/maccess.c
index 518a25667323..a3533a0d0677 100644
--- a/mm/maccess.c
+++ b/mm/maccess.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ bool __weak copy_from_kernel_nofault_allowed(const
void *unsafe_src,
#define copy_from_kernel_nofault_loop(dst, src, len, type, err_label) \
while (len >= sizeof(type)) { \
- __get_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label); \
+ __get_kernel_nofault_wrapper(dst, src, type, err_label);\
dst += sizeof(type); \
src += sizeof(type); \
len -= sizeof(type); \
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(copy_from_kernel_nofault);
#define copy_to_kernel_nofault_loop(dst, src, len, type, err_label) \
while (len >= sizeof(type)) { \
- __put_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label); \
+ __put_kernel_nofault_wrapper(dst, src, type, err_label);\
dst += sizeof(type); \
src += sizeof(type); \
len -= sizeof(type); \
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-23 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-17 20:18 [PATCH] " Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-09-17 22:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-09-18 10:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-09-18 15:15 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-09-19 10:57 ` [PATCH v3] " Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-09-20 22:26 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-09-21 7:10 ` [PATCH v4] " Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-09-21 20:49 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-09-22 9:26 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-09-22 12:04 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-09-22 14:57 ` [PATCH v5] " Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-09-23 6:09 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov [this message]
2024-09-27 15:18 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2024-09-22 12:06 ` [PATCH v4] " Andrey Konovalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACzwLxg7_HPxbjLT1v+dHG=V0wAcUJYZvqdcdLBD9xhLgNUmqQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=snovitoll@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox