From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com (mail-pd0-f182.google.com [209.85.192.182]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F826B0032 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:18:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id y10so26228397pdj.13 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:18:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com (mail-pd0-x22e.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id kz17si1470311pab.60.2015.01.19.09.18.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:18:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id ft15so8448060pdb.5 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:18:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150119170429.GA13160@jeremy-HP> References: <20150115223157.GB25884@quack.suse.cz> <20150116165506.GA10856@samba2> <20150119071218.GA9747@jeremy-HP> <1421652849.2080.20.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20150119170429.GA13160@jeremy-HP> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:18:14 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] async buffered diskio read for userspace apps From: Richard Sharpe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Jeremy Allison Cc: Milosz Tanski , James Bottomley , Jens Axboe , Volker Lendecke , Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , linux-mm@kvack.org, "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:34 AM, James Bottomley > wrote: >> >> That's one of these pointless licensing complexities that annoy >> distributions so much ... they're both open source, so there's no real >> problem except the licence incompatibility. The usual way out of it is >> just to dual licence the incompatible component. > > Just one point here - we're not able to dual license > Samba to go back to GPLv2 anything. There are too many > contributors to this who have contributed under v3-or-later > licensing in order for this to be possible for us. > > I'm hoping adding the 'or-later' clause to fio might > be easier. As someone who has worked for companies that distribute Samba for quite a while I cannot see us distributing fio. Rather, we would use it as a performance testing tool. That being the case, the license differences are not a problem. Am I missing something here? --=20 Regards, Richard Sharpe (=E4=BD=95=E4=BB=A5=E8=A7=A3=E6=86=82=EF=BC=9F=E5=94=AF=E6=9C=89=E6=9D=9C= =E5=BA=B7=E3=80=82--=E6=9B=B9=E6=93=8D) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org