From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11BAC4332F for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 01:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 508216B0075; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 20:34:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4B8036B0078; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 20:34:47 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 380596B007B; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 20:34:47 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EC36B0075 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 20:34:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin21.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB253C0163 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 01:34:46 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80144843772.21.346451A Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com (mail-pj1-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41]) by imf21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDC61C0005 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 01:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id b1-20020a17090a7ac100b00213fde52d49so3676986pjl.3 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:34:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=C5Hk9Ur/MVcdwu5b/KJPBBA9azkNvf5t8plo/ww/Ngc=; b=GoWMTtbF2Ees0wzrM0kIOGD8LKg/77f4/mKaZ3nMIuBdOOSAuQERNzA0LgTKTQWO7y Topfs1unVkvFS3EZTib1cmRosjiy2d8Iph/RIRnCxlKfIOh/ATEY0dhjCzcDNIp+kuuQ 3Wo0Pno7F55z4NJNpBGutpvRyooCySETBbhgZcTqf4SQpgGDXiwCVAhPX+1iOJX6PXQv LkjcWVFyjbuWCGeeBBREprPI7Z/pRbp2RxrMo3sX+GG0xnr30dVQ+4pQHUhaZPyi3nRc qQCv3tiMtP78F2Z/XBcLCYw56BkCP4Vav+PDWTIiBS7K3qeuthzKIfOGUqdoZ9V9c0dq ICbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=C5Hk9Ur/MVcdwu5b/KJPBBA9azkNvf5t8plo/ww/Ngc=; b=uUok3tOAAmF0Gp2O+3ITMQ2VFpk4/ilNKugDn03h6lQXwnvcK87idvPaUIxeAzcy/7 lcMxdxwmKuhdbXO5V3BT2mNAyAUHeeHZZxNODTDlRlKaB3pq1HVp8kvJwSFCPAZpB8e2 BZXBWT0lLo+1YRbcFObsBxo34HhEEtupkoJUzEEDKNqEGLdQTfu/1VK6KmPpN6/zMt12 +POBbr0BHVGDpelNRkAiF+Nm7g8ix1Ev/7eTVitq2uNI8aDI8Xwvo0FuxgPw0DFbtECt GwWcUPKNnO3Bfftq0urSWW6+o2tRGxRYkOjgCSm62R9vGugqu/LH79PxTpSQNs9u9DS4 cVjA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmh3W0++hAWrrSyfhdU63XMdqTpYFeBpsNGpNgrqc3N9Nz0opFf gt3an+wFk8S3FUGMsO2Hr7bFlKFWwbu0ojrXSFFjpw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4aUfL6G+skcoZz2AlGAnyFMW3mFEDfXYBTc/4Zc7rPJTwuOESsNwuQIIfgKxLB7DZWZbpzU2WK7VAPqOfWc5w= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d2c2:b0:188:f993:724a with SMTP id n2-20020a170902d2c200b00188f993724amr2451920plc.77.1668735285533; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:34:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221107025359.2911028-1-jiaqiyan@google.com> <20221107125315.b2916c557ff35d3b74aee503@linux-foundation.org> <20221116135243.b1db6b864efb89595d174be2@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20221116135243.b1db6b864efb89595d174be2@linux-foundation.org> From: Jiaqi Yan Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:34:34 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Memory poison recovery in khugepaged collapsing To: Andrew Morton Cc: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, kirill@shutemov.name, tongtiangen@huawei.com, tony.luck@intel.com, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com, linmiaohe@huawei.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Oscar Salvador , Yang Shi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1668735286; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=0jVbeYnfH15EIbShYwnnS3ryzyPgHRaIHeW0mP9RHA8nfOcP6BWmYO0lMwtSWYGFiAsRNz UG6oVk2QwVcAvv1Fg95I6MuGYDXN27OnnAXmcjj8fR3723zvhdrbion65y7HiMGkEN/Ejn 1QvDqk7Htvoltv2fZqUA5azJSwNBDYs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf21.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=GoWMTtbF; spf=pass (imf21.hostedemail.com: domain of jiaqiyan@google.com designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jiaqiyan@google.com; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1668735286; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=C5Hk9Ur/MVcdwu5b/KJPBBA9azkNvf5t8plo/ww/Ngc=; b=rpNlgpvCJwU6DRrC+SOawhaRrKdbCUOEmdZ3CjUKF8fRFg9bbND2S8aA8KVpn9MyaPHuua MDrbfj4z+2R0jprYx1XrHr7PRgmaaDi7uZREGMUieb5FlceT4KCXo1kStCnyAakWLdymYO foki2ZC7RONbmAy92zp8QMzg7o1CYN0= Authentication-Results: imf21.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=GoWMTtbF; spf=pass (imf21.hostedemail.com: domain of jiaqiyan@google.com designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jiaqiyan@google.com; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9DDC61C0005 X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: owh88jurfgs74prhtwxyc7srj8rpaqy4 X-HE-Tag: 1668735286-428671 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 1:52 PM Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 09:58:23 -0800 Jiaqi Yan wrote: > > > Thanks for ccing Oscar, Andrew. > > > > After getting this patch into our internal production environment, I > > recently found a regression bug introduced by my commit a0157a2c735b > > ("mm/khugepaged: recover from poisoned file-backed memory"). > > Given it is only in mm-unstable, I wonder should I put out a v7 with > > the fix, or should I make it a new and separate commit? > > Either approach is OK. I usually convert replacement patches into > deltas so I and others can see what changed. But people like to see > the whole patch for review purposes, so I guess that if you email out a > new version of the patch, we get to see both. > > Thanks Andrew. I just sent out v7 with the fix.