linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@google.com>
To: jackmanb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, linmiaohe@huawei.com,
	 ziy@nvidia.com, harry.yoo@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org
Cc: nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, david@redhat.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,  william.roche@oracle.com,
	tony.luck@intel.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	 jane.chu@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	osalvador@suse.de,  muchun.song@linux.dev, rientjes@google.com,
	duenwen@google.com,  jthoughton@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	 mhocko@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Only free healthy pages in high-order HWPoison folio
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 14:06:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACw3F501wCmc4G+69pmkkONTxUNJHeuo+7JqHhQ2W-L9vQ474A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219183346.3627510-1-jiaqiyan@google.com>

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 10:33 AM Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@google.com> wrote:
>
> At the end of dissolve_free_hugetlb_folio that a free HugeTLB
> folio becomes non-HugeTLB, it is released to buddy allocator
> as a high-order folio, e.g. a folio that contains 262144 pages
> if the folio was a 1G HugeTLB hugepage.
>
> This is problematic if the HugeTLB hugepage contained HWPoison
> subpages. In that case, since buddy allocator does not check
> HWPoison for non-zero-order folio, the raw HWPoison page can
> be given out with its buddy page and be re-used by either
> kernel or userspace.
>
> Memory failure recovery (MFR) in kernel does attempt to take
> raw HWPoison page off buddy allocator after
> dissolve_free_hugetlb_folio. However, there is always a time
> window between dissolve_free_hugetlb_folio frees a HWPoison
> high-order folio to buddy allocator and MFR takes HWPoison
> raw page off buddy allocator.
>
> One obvious way to avoid this problem is to add page sanity
> checks in page allocate or free path. However, it is against
> the past efforts to reduce sanity check overhead [1,2,3].
>
> Introduce free_has_hwpoison_pages to only free the healthy
> pages and excludes the HWPoison ones in the high-order folio.
> The idea is to iterate through the sub-pages of the folio to
> identify contiguous ranges of healthy pages. Instead of freeing
> pages one by one, decompose healthy ranges into the largest
> possible blocks. Each block meets the requirements to be freed
> to buddy allocator by calling __free_frozen_pages directly.
>
> free_has_hwpoison_pages has linear time complexity O(N) wrt the
> number of pages in the folio. While the power-of-two decomposition
> ensures that the number of calls to the buddy allocator is
> logarithmic for each contiguous healthy range, the mandatory
> linear scan of pages to identify PageHWPoison defines the
> overall time complexity.
>
> I tested with some test-only code [4] and hugetlb-mfr [5], by
> checking the status of pcplist and freelist immediately after
> dissolve_free_hugetlb_folio a free hugetlb page that contains
> 3 HWPoison raw pages:
>
> * HWPoison pages are excluded by free_has_hwpoison_pages.
>
> * Some healthy pages can be in zone->per_cpu_pageset (pcplist)
>   because pcp_count is not high enough.
>
> * Many healthy pages are already in some order's
>   zone->free_area[order].free_list (freelist).
>
> * In rare cases, some healthy pages are in neither pcplist
>   nor freelist. My best guest is they are allocated before
>   the test checks.

Sorry, just realized changelog is missing. Appending it here:

Changelog

v1 [6] => v2:
- Total reimplementation based on discussions with Mathew Wilcox,
  Harry Hoo, Zi Yan etc.
- hugetlb_free_hwpoison_folio => free_has_hwpoison_pages.
- Utilize has_hwpoisoned flag to tell buddy allocator a high-order
  folio contains HWPoison.
- Simplify __page_handle_poison given that HWPoison page
  won't be freed within the high-order folio.

>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1460711275-1130-15-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1460711275-1130-16-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230216095131.17336-1-vbabka@suse.cz
> [4] https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CzJn1Cc4wCCm183Y77h244fyZIkTLzCt/view?usp=sharing
> [5] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20251116013223.1557158-3-jiaqiyan@google.com

[6] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20251116014721.1561456-1-jiaqiyan@google.com

>
> Jiaqi Yan (3):
>   mm/memory-failure: set has_hwpoisoned flags on HugeTLB folio
>   mm/page_alloc: only free healthy pages in high-order HWPoison folio
>   mm/memory-failure: simplify __page_handle_poison
>
>  include/linux/page-flags.h |   2 +-
>  mm/memory-failure.c        |  32 +++---------
>  mm/page_alloc.c            | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.52.0.322.g1dd061c0dc-goog
>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-22 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-19 18:33 Jiaqi Yan
2025-12-19 18:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/memory-failure: set has_hwpoisoned flags on HugeTLB folio Jiaqi Yan
2025-12-19 18:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/page_alloc: only free healthy pages in high-order HWPoison folio Jiaqi Yan
2025-12-23  5:14   ` Harry Yoo
2025-12-27  1:50     ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-12-29  1:15       ` Harry Yoo
2025-12-31  0:19         ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-12-31  4:37           ` Harry Yoo
2025-12-23  7:45   ` Miaohe Lin
2025-12-27  1:50     ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-12-19 18:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/memory-failure: simplify __page_handle_poison Jiaqi Yan
2025-12-22 22:12   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-12-22 23:13     ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-12-22 22:06 ` Jiaqi Yan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACw3F501wCmc4G+69pmkkONTxUNJHeuo+7JqHhQ2W-L9vQ474A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jiaqiyan@google.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=duenwen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=william.roche@oracle.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox