linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vacek <neelx@redhat.com>
To: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
	Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>,
	Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
	Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@intel.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
	YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
	Jia He <jia.he@hxt-semitech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in early_pfn_valid()
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 19:51:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACjP9X_MNrL_4VdR+oMVb4nAfwAmWrUy-cK88V_i0ft71S2bJA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1522033340-6575-6-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:02 AM, Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns
> where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But there is
> still some room for improvement. E.g. in early_pfn_valid(), if pfn and
> pfn+1 are in the same memblock region, we can record the last returned
> memblock region index and check check pfn++ is still in the same region.
>
> Currently it only improve the performance on arm64 and will have no
> impact on other arches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia He <jia.he@hxt-semitech.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h |  2 +-
>  include/linux/mmzone.h           | 12 +++++++++---
>  mm/page_alloc.c                  |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h
> index 73d8dd1..329d3ba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(int pfn)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -#define early_pfn_valid(pfn)   pfn_valid((pfn))
> +#define early_pfn_valid(pfn, last_region_idx)  pfn_valid((pfn))
>
>  #endif /* CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM */
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index d797716..3a686af 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1267,9 +1267,15 @@ static inline int pfn_present(unsigned long pfn)
>  })
>  #else
>  #define pfn_to_nid(pfn)                (0)
> -#endif
> +#endif /*CONFIG_NUMA*/
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
> +#define early_pfn_valid(pfn, last_region_idx) \
> +                               pfn_valid_region(pfn, last_region_idx)
> +#else
> +#define early_pfn_valid(pfn, last_region_idx)  pfn_valid(pfn)
> +#endif /*CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID*/
>
> -#define early_pfn_valid(pfn)   pfn_valid(pfn)
>  void sparse_init(void);
>  #else
>  #define sparse_init()  do {} while (0)
> @@ -1288,7 +1294,7 @@ struct mminit_pfnnid_cache {
>  };
>
>  #ifndef early_pfn_valid
> -#define early_pfn_valid(pfn)   (1)
> +#define early_pfn_valid(pfn, last_region_idx)  (1)
>  #endif
>
>  void memory_present(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 0bb0274..debccf3 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5484,7 +5484,7 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone,
>                 if (context != MEMMAP_EARLY)
>                         goto not_early;
>
> -               if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn)) {
> +               if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn, &idx)) {
>  #if (defined CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK) && (defined CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID)
>                         /*
>                          * Skip to the pfn preceding the next valid one (or
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Hmm, what about making index global variable instead of changing all
the prototypes? Similar to early_pfnnid_cache for example. Something
like:

#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
extern int early_region_idx __meminitdata;
#define early_pfn_valid(pfn) \
                               pfn_valid_region(pfn, &early_region_idx)
#else
#define early_pfn_valid(pfn)  pfn_valid(pfn)
#endif /*CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID*/

And move this to arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h ?

--nX

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-27 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-26  3:02 [PATCH v3 0/5] optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn and early_pfn_valid Jia He
2018-03-26  3:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID is enable Jia He
2018-03-28  9:18   ` Wei Yang
2018-03-28  9:49     ` Jia He
2018-04-02  8:12       ` Wei Yang
2018-04-02  9:17         ` Jia He
2018-04-03  0:14           ` Wei Yang
2018-03-26  3:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn() Jia He
2018-03-27 17:17   ` Daniel Vacek
2018-03-28  2:09     ` Jia He
2018-03-28  9:26   ` Wei Yang
2018-03-29  8:06     ` Jia He
2018-03-30  1:43       ` Wei Yang
2018-03-30  2:12         ` Jia He
2018-03-26  3:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mm/memblock: introduce memblock_search_pfn_regions() Jia He
2018-03-26  3:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: introduce pfn_valid_region() Jia He
2018-03-28  9:38   ` Wei Yang
2018-03-26  3:02 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in early_pfn_valid() Jia He
2018-03-27 17:51   ` Daniel Vacek [this message]
2018-03-28  2:10     ` Jia He
2018-03-27  1:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn and early_pfn_valid Wei Yang
2018-03-27  7:15   ` Jia He
2018-03-28  0:30     ` Wei Yang
2018-03-28  1:45       ` Jia He
2018-03-28  2:36         ` Wei Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACjP9X_MNrL_4VdR+oMVb4nAfwAmWrUy-cK88V_i0ft71S2bJA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=neelx@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=erosca@de.adit-jv.com \
    --cc=gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hejianet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jia.he@hxt-semitech.com \
    --cc=kemi.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
    --cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
    --cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox