linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
To: Hui Zhu <hui.zhu@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
	 Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
	Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,  Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	 YoungJun Park <youngjun.park@lge.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Hui Zhu <zhuhui@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm/swap: strengthen locking assertions and invariants in cluster allocation
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 10:34:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACePvbVKmAPKRRzfZ-id=5ESf3SL1QPYU4p5xBJBg4F9ocPb8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311022241.177801-1-hui.zhu@linux.dev>

On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 7:23 PM Hui Zhu <hui.zhu@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> From: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@kylinos.cn>
>
> The swap_cluster_alloc_table() function requires several locks to be held
> by its callers: ci->lock, the per-CPU swap_cluster lock, and, for
> non-solid-state devices (non-SWP_SOLIDSTATE), the si->global_cluster_lock.
>
> While most call paths (e.g., via cluster_alloc_swap_entry() or
> alloc_swap_scan_list()) correctly acquire these locks before invocation,
> the path through swap_reclaim_work() -> swap_reclaim_full_clusters() ->
> isolate_lock_cluster() is distinct. This path operates exclusively on
> si->full_clusters, where the swap allocation tables are guaranteed to be
> already allocated. Consequently, isolate_lock_cluster() should never
> trigger a call to swap_cluster_alloc_table() for these clusters.
>
> Strengthen the locking and state assertions to formalize these invariants:
>
> 1. Add a lockdep_assert_held() for si->global_cluster_lock in
>    swap_cluster_alloc_table() for non-SWP_SOLIDSTATE devices.
> 2. Reorder existing lockdep assertions in swap_cluster_alloc_table() to
>    match the actual lock acquisition order (per-CPU lock, then global lock,
>    then cluster lock).
> 3. Add a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() in isolate_lock_cluster() to ensure that table
>    allocations are only attempted for clusters being isolated from the
>    free list. Attempting to allocate a table for a cluster from other
>    lists (like the full list during reclaim) indicates a violation of
>    subsystem invariants.
>
> These changes ensure locking consistency and help catch potential
> synchronization or logic issues during development.
>
> Changelog:
> v4:
> According to the comments of Barry Song, remove redundant comment.
> v3:
> According to the comments of Kairui Song, squash patches and fix logic
> bug in isolate_lock_cluster() where flags were cleared before check.
> v2:
> According to the comments of YoungJun Park, Kairui Song and Chris Li,
> change acquire locks in swap_reclaim_work() to adds a VM_WARN_ON in
> isolate_lock_cluster().
> According to the comments of YoungJun Park, add code in patch 2 to Change
> the order of lockdep_assert_held() to match the actual lock acquisition
> order.
>
> Reviewed-by: Youngjun Park <youngjun.park@lge.com>
> Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@kylinos.cn>

Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>

> ---
>  mm/swapfile.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 94af29d1de88..e25cdb0046d8 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -476,8 +476,10 @@ swap_cluster_alloc_table(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>          * Only cluster isolation from the allocator does table allocation.
>          * Swap allocator uses percpu clusters and holds the local lock.
>          */
> -       lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
>         lockdep_assert_held(&this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_swap_cluster)->lock);
> +       if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE))
> +               lockdep_assert_held(&si->global_cluster_lock);
> +       lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
>
>         /* The cluster must be free and was just isolated from the free list. */
>         VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(ci->flags || !cluster_is_empty(ci));
> @@ -577,6 +579,7 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *isolate_lock_cluster(
>                 struct swap_info_struct *si, struct list_head *list)
>  {
>         struct swap_cluster_info *ci, *found = NULL;
> +       u8 flags;

Nit pick: consider initializing the value. The flags assignment occurs
in a conditional block. The compiler might or might not realize the
"flags" assigned only if "found" is also assigned, and might complain
that flags can be used without initialization.

>
>         spin_lock(&si->lock);
>         list_for_each_entry(ci, list, list) {
> @@ -589,6 +592,7 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *isolate_lock_cluster(
>                           ci->flags != CLUSTER_FLAG_FULL);
>
>                 list_del(&ci->list);
> +               flags = ci->flags;

If VM debug is disabled, this variable is not used after its value is
assigned. Please test it with gcc and llvm (VM debug disabled) to
ensure it doesn't generate any warnings. I don't expect it to be, I
just want to make sure.

Chris

>                 ci->flags = CLUSTER_FLAG_NONE;
>                 found = ci;
>                 break;
> @@ -597,6 +601,7 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *isolate_lock_cluster(
>
>         if (found && !cluster_table_is_alloced(found)) {
>                 /* Only an empty free cluster's swap table can be freed. */
> +               VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(flags != CLUSTER_FLAG_FREE);
>                 VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(list != &si->free_clusters);
>                 VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!cluster_is_empty(found));
>                 return swap_cluster_alloc_table(si, found);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-11 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-11  2:22 Hui Zhu
2026-03-11 17:34 ` Chris Li [this message]
2026-03-12  2:13   ` Geliang Tang
2026-03-12  2:15   ` hui.zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACePvbVKmAPKRRzfZ-id=5ESf3SL1QPYU4p5xBJBg4F9ocPb8A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=hui.zhu@linux.dev \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=youngjun.park@lge.com \
    --cc=zhuhui@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox