From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
To: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, hawk@kernel.org, linyunsheng@huawei.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jasowang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] page_pool: Rename pp_frag_count to pp_ref_count
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 11:59:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC_iWjL68n-GRN7vs_jwvzbnVy8sPh4_SP=wVDq0HkFOmSU-nQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231130115611.6632-2-liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11360 bytes --]
Hi Liang,
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 13:59, Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> To support multiple users referencing the same fragment, pp_frag_count is
> renamed to pp_ref_count to better reflect its actual meaning based on the
> suggestion from [1].
>
The patch does more than what the description says and those should be in 2
different patches.
I am ok with pp_frag_count -> pp_ref_count, for the functions I am not the
rename makes anything better.
Jakub are you ok with the name changes or is it going to make bisecting a
pain?
Thanks
/Ilias
> [1]
>
> http://lore.kernel.org/netdev/f71d9448-70c8-8793-dc9a-0eb48a570300@huawei.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c | 4 +-
> include/linux/mm_types.h | 2 +-
> include/net/page_pool/helpers.h | 45 ++++++++++---------
> include/net/page_pool/types.h | 6 +--
> net/core/page_pool.c | 12 ++---
> 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
> index 8d9743a5e42c..98d33ac7ec64 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
> @@ -298,8 +298,8 @@ static void mlx5e_page_release_fragmented(struct
> mlx5e_rq *rq,
> u16 drain_count = MLX5E_PAGECNT_BIAS_MAX - frag_page->frags;
> struct page *page = frag_page->page;
>
> - if (page_pool_defrag_page(page, drain_count) == 0)
> - page_pool_put_defragged_page(rq->page_pool, page, -1,
> true);
> + if (page_pool_unref_page(page, drain_count) == 0)
> + page_pool_put_unrefed_page(rq->page_pool, page, -1, true);
> }
>
> static inline int mlx5e_get_rx_frag(struct mlx5e_rq *rq,
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index 957ce38768b2..64e4572ef06d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct page {
> struct page_pool *pp;
> unsigned long _pp_mapping_pad;
> unsigned long dma_addr;
> - atomic_long_t pp_frag_count;
> + atomic_long_t pp_ref_count;
> };
> struct { /* Tail pages of compound page */
> unsigned long compound_head; /* Bit zero is set
> */
> diff --git a/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h
> b/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h
> index 4ebd544ae977..9dc8eaf8a959 100644
> --- a/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h
> +++ b/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
> * page allocated from page pool. Page splitting enables memory saving
> and thus
> * avoids TLB/cache miss for data access, but there also is some cost to
> * implement page splitting, mainly some cache line dirtying/bouncing for
> - * 'struct page' and atomic operation for page->pp_frag_count.
> + * 'struct page' and atomic operation for page->pp_ref_count.
> *
> * The API keeps track of in-flight pages, in order to let API users know
> when
> * it is safe to free a page_pool object, the API users must call
> @@ -214,69 +214,74 @@ inline enum dma_data_direction
> page_pool_get_dma_dir(struct page_pool *pool)
> return pool->p.dma_dir;
> }
>
> -/* pp_frag_count represents the number of writers who can update the page
> +/* pp_ref_count represents the number of writers who can update the page
> * either by updating skb->data or via DMA mappings for the device.
> * We can't rely on the page refcnt for that as we don't know who might be
> * holding page references and we can't reliably destroy or sync DMA
> mappings
> * of the fragments.
> *
> - * When pp_frag_count reaches 0 we can either recycle the page if the page
> + * pp_ref_count initially corresponds to the number of fragments. However,
> + * when multiple users start to reference a single fragment, for example
> in
> + * skb_try_coalesce, the pp_ref_count will become greater than the number
> of
> + * fragments.
> + *
> + * When pp_ref_count reaches 0 we can either recycle the page if the page
> * refcnt is 1 or return it back to the memory allocator and destroy any
> * mappings we have.
> */
> static inline void page_pool_fragment_page(struct page *page, long nr)
> {
> - atomic_long_set(&page->pp_frag_count, nr);
> + atomic_long_set(&page->pp_ref_count, nr);
> }
>
> -static inline long page_pool_defrag_page(struct page *page, long nr)
> +static inline long page_pool_unref_page(struct page *page, long nr)
> {
> long ret;
>
> - /* If nr == pp_frag_count then we have cleared all remaining
> + /* If nr == pp_ref_count then we have cleared all remaining
> * references to the page:
> * 1. 'n == 1': no need to actually overwrite it.
> * 2. 'n != 1': overwrite it with one, which is the rare case
> - * for pp_frag_count draining.
> + * for pp_ref_count draining.
> *
> * The main advantage to doing this is that not only we avoid a
> atomic
> * update, as an atomic_read is generally a much cheaper operation
> than
> * an atomic update, especially when dealing with a page that may
> be
> - * partitioned into only 2 or 3 pieces; but also unify the
> pp_frag_count
> + * referenced by only 2 or 3 users; but also unify the pp_ref_count
> * handling by ensuring all pages have partitioned into only 1
> piece
> * initially, and only overwrite it when the page is partitioned
> into
> * more than one piece.
> */
> - if (atomic_long_read(&page->pp_frag_count) == nr) {
> + if (atomic_long_read(&page->pp_ref_count) == nr) {
> /* As we have ensured nr is always one for constant case
> using
> * the BUILD_BUG_ON(), only need to handle the
> non-constant case
> - * here for pp_frag_count draining, which is a rare case.
> + * here for pp_ref_count draining, which is a rare case.
> */
> BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(nr) && nr != 1);
> if (!__builtin_constant_p(nr))
> - atomic_long_set(&page->pp_frag_count, 1);
> + atomic_long_set(&page->pp_ref_count, 1);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> - ret = atomic_long_sub_return(nr, &page->pp_frag_count);
> + ret = atomic_long_sub_return(nr, &page->pp_ref_count);
> WARN_ON(ret < 0);
>
> - /* We are the last user here too, reset pp_frag_count back to 1 to
> + /* We are the last user here too, reset pp_ref_count back to 1 to
> * ensure all pages have been partitioned into 1 piece initially,
> * this should be the rare case when the last two fragment users
> call
> - * page_pool_defrag_page() currently.
> + * page_pool_unref_page() currently.
> */
> if (unlikely(!ret))
> - atomic_long_set(&page->pp_frag_count, 1);
> + atomic_long_set(&page->pp_ref_count, 1);
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static inline bool page_pool_is_last_frag(struct page *page)
> +static inline bool page_pool_is_last_ref(struct page *page)
> {
> - /* If page_pool_defrag_page() returns 0, we were the last user */
> - return page_pool_defrag_page(page, 1) == 0;
> + /* If page_pool_unref_page() returns 0, we were the last user */
> + return page_pool_unref_page(page, 1) == 0;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -301,10 +306,10 @@ static inline void page_pool_put_page(struct
> page_pool *pool,
> * allow registering MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL, but shield linker.
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL
> - if (!page_pool_is_last_frag(page))
> + if (!page_pool_is_last_ref(page))
> return;
>
> - page_pool_put_defragged_page(pool, page, dma_sync_size,
> allow_direct);
> + page_pool_put_unrefed_page(pool, page, dma_sync_size,
> allow_direct);
> #endif
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/net/page_pool/types.h b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> index e1bb92c192de..6a5323619f6e 100644
> --- a/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> +++ b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
> @@ -224,9 +224,9 @@ static inline void page_pool_put_page_bulk(struct
> page_pool *pool, void **data,
> }
> #endif
>
> -void page_pool_put_defragged_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page
> *page,
> - unsigned int dma_sync_size,
> - bool allow_direct);
> +void page_pool_put_unrefed_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page,
> + unsigned int dma_sync_size,
> + bool allow_direct);
>
> static inline bool is_page_pool_compiled_in(void)
> {
> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
> index df2a06d7da52..106220b1f89c 100644
> --- a/net/core/page_pool.c
> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
> @@ -650,8 +650,8 @@ __page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct
> page *page,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -void page_pool_put_defragged_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page
> *page,
> - unsigned int dma_sync_size, bool
> allow_direct)
> +void page_pool_put_unrefed_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page,
> + unsigned int dma_sync_size, bool
> allow_direct)
> {
> page = __page_pool_put_page(pool, page, dma_sync_size,
> allow_direct);
> if (page && !page_pool_recycle_in_ring(pool, page)) {
> @@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ void page_pool_put_defragged_page(struct page_pool
> *pool, struct page *page,
> page_pool_return_page(pool, page);
> }
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_put_defragged_page);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_put_unrefed_page);
>
> /**
> * page_pool_put_page_bulk() - release references on multiple pages
> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ void page_pool_put_page_bulk(struct page_pool *pool,
> void **data,
> struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(data[i]);
>
> /* It is not the last user for the page frag case */
> - if (!page_pool_is_last_frag(page))
> + if (!page_pool_is_last_ref(page))
> continue;
>
> page = __page_pool_put_page(pool, page, -1, false);
> @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static struct page *page_pool_drain_frag(struct
> page_pool *pool,
> long drain_count = BIAS_MAX - pool->frag_users;
>
> /* Some user is still using the page frag */
> - if (likely(page_pool_defrag_page(page, drain_count)))
> + if (likely(page_pool_unref_page(page, drain_count)))
> return NULL;
>
> if (page_ref_count(page) == 1 && !page_is_pfmemalloc(page)) {
> @@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ static void page_pool_free_frag(struct page_pool *pool)
>
> pool->frag_page = NULL;
>
> - if (!page || page_pool_defrag_page(page, drain_count))
> + if (!page || page_pool_unref_page(page, drain_count))
> return;
>
> page_pool_return_page(pool, page);
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 14393 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-01 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-30 11:56 [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] skbuff: Optimize SKB coalescing for page pool Liang Chen
2023-11-30 11:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] page_pool: Rename pp_frag_count to pp_ref_count Liang Chen
2023-12-01 9:59 ` Ilias Apalodimas [this message]
2023-12-01 10:10 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-12-02 2:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-12-04 2:39 ` Liang Chen
2023-11-30 11:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/4] page_pool: halve BIAS_MAX for multiple user references of a fragment Liang Chen
2023-11-30 11:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/4] skbuff: Add a function to check if a page belongs to page_pool Liang Chen
2023-12-01 10:07 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-12-01 10:22 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-12-04 2:40 ` Liang Chen
2023-12-05 11:02 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-11-30 11:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] skbuff: Optimization of SKB coalescing for page pool Liang Chen
2023-12-01 10:34 ` Ilias Apalodimas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAC_iWjL68n-GRN7vs_jwvzbnVy8sPh4_SP=wVDq0HkFOmSU-nQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox