linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,  ziy@nvidia.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-new v5 2/5] mm: khugepaged: refine scan progress number
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 23:25:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACZaFFN-dES3HuifdQTjfNr6P=EZQfYkt+O7V_rZ6+yC9Kf98Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98bdfd16-cb50-47a8-999a-bbd9829c6350@arm.com>

On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 6:46 PM Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 23/01/26 1:52 pm, Vernon Yang wrote:
> > From: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
> >
> > Currently, each scan always increases "progress" by HPAGE_PMD_NR,
> > even if only scanning a single PTE/PMD entry.
> >
> > - When only scanning a sigle PTE entry, let me provide a detailed
> >   example:
> >
> > static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd()
> > {
> >       for (addr = start_addr, _pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> >            _pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> >               pte_t pteval = ptep_get(_pte);
> >               ...
> >               if (pte_uffd_wp(pteval)) { <-- first scan hit
> >                       result = SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP;
> >                       goto out_unmap;
> >               }
> >       }
> > }
> >
> > During the first scan, if pte_uffd_wp(pteval) is true, the loop exits
> > directly. In practice, only one PTE is scanned before termination.
> > Here, "progress += 1" reflects the actual number of PTEs scanned, but
> > previously "progress += HPAGE_PMD_NR" always.
> >
> > - When the memory has been collapsed to PMD, let me provide a detailed
> >   example:
> >
> > The following data is traced by bpftrace on a desktop system. After
> > the system has been left idle for 10 minutes upon booting, a lot of
> > SCAN_PMD_MAPPED or SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE are observed during a full scan
> > by khugepaged.
> >
> > @scan_pmd_status[1]: 1           ## SCAN_SUCCEED
> > @scan_pmd_status[6]: 2           ## SCAN_EXCEED_SHARED_PTE
> > @scan_pmd_status[3]: 142         ## SCAN_PMD_MAPPED
> > @scan_pmd_status[2]: 178         ## SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE
> > total progress size: 674 MB
> > Total time         : 419 seconds ## include khugepaged_scan_sleep_millisecs
> >
> > The khugepaged_scan list save all task that support collapse into hugepage,
> > as long as the task is not destroyed, khugepaged will not remove it from
> > the khugepaged_scan list. This exist a phenomenon where task has already
> > collapsed all memory regions into hugepage, but khugepaged continues to
> > scan it, which wastes CPU time and invalid, and due to
> > khugepaged_scan_sleep_millisecs (default 10s) causes a long wait for
> > scanning a large number of invalid task, so scanning really valid task
> > is later.
> >
> > After applying this patch, when the memory is either SCAN_PMD_MAPPED or
> > SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE, just skip it, as follow:
> >
> > @scan_pmd_status[6]: 2
> > @scan_pmd_status[3]: 147
> > @scan_pmd_status[2]: 173
> > total progress size: 45 MB
> > Total time         : 20 seconds
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/xarray.h |  9 ++++++++
> >  mm/khugepaged.c        | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/xarray.h b/include/linux/xarray.h
> > index be850174e802..f77d97d7b957 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/xarray.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/xarray.h
> > @@ -1646,6 +1646,15 @@ static inline void xas_set(struct xa_state *xas, unsigned long index)
> >       xas->xa_node = XAS_RESTART;
> >  }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * xas_get_index() - Get XArray operation state for a different index.
> > + * @xas: XArray operation state.
> > + */
> > +static inline unsigned long xas_get_index(struct xa_state *xas)
> > +{
> > +     return xas->xa_index;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Why is this needed?

Please refer to hpage_collapse_scan_file(), which obtains the starting
address of the last folio when exiting xas_for_each().

Using "xas->xa_index" directly is also acceptable.

> >  /**
> >   * xas_advance() - Skip over sibling entries.
> >   * @xas: XArray operation state.
> > diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > index 6f0f05148765..de95029e3763 100644
> > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > @@ -68,7 +68,10 @@ enum scan_result {
> >  static struct task_struct *khugepaged_thread __read_mostly;
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(khugepaged_mutex);
> >
> > -/* default scan 8*HPAGE_PMD_NR ptes (or vmas) every 10 second */
> > +/*
> > + * default scan 8*HPAGE_PMD_NR ptes, pmd_mapped, no_pte_table or vmas
> > + * every 10 second.
> > + */
> >  static unsigned int khugepaged_pages_to_scan __read_mostly;
> >  static unsigned int khugepaged_pages_collapsed;
> >  static unsigned int khugepaged_full_scans;
> > @@ -1240,7 +1243,8 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long a
> >  }
> >
> >  static enum scan_result hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > -             struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start_addr, bool *mmap_locked,
> > +             struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start_addr,
> > +             bool *mmap_locked, unsigned int *cur_progress,
> >               struct collapse_control *cc)
> >  {
> >       pmd_t *pmd;
> > @@ -1255,6 +1259,9 @@ static enum scan_result hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >
> >       VM_BUG_ON(start_addr & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
> >
> > +     if (cur_progress)
> > +             *cur_progress += 1;
> > +
>
> 1. Why do we need to do if (cur_progress). Isn't it guaranteed that the pointer will never be NULL.

cur_progress is NULL at madvise_collapse()

> 2. Why do we increment this on function entry?

When the memory has been collapsed to PMD, we increment one only, same as
the previous PATCH #3 [1].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260111121909.8410-4-yanglincheng@kylinos.cn

>
> >       result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, start_addr, &pmd);
> >       if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
> >               goto out;
> > @@ -1396,6 +1403,12 @@ static enum scan_result hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >               result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
> >       }
> >  out_unmap:
> > +     if (cur_progress) {
> > +             if (_pte >= pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR)
> > +                     *cur_progress += HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1;
> > +             else
> > +                     *cur_progress += _pte - pte;
> > +     }
>
> Why are two cases required here - shouldn't it just be _pte - pte?

At the function entry, "cur_progress += 1", If this PMD is SCAN_PMD_MAPPED
or SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE, return directly. otherwise,

When "_pte == pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR" to exit loop, HPAGE_PMD_NR
(also "_pte - pte") PTEs have been scanned, the "cur_progress" needs to be
incremented by "HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1".

When "_pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR" to break loop, "_pte - pte + 1" PTEs have
been scanned, and "cur_progress" needs to be incremented by "_pte - pte".

> >       pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
> >       if (result == SCAN_SUCCEED) {
> >               result = collapse_huge_page(mm, start_addr, referenced,
> > @@ -2286,8 +2299,9 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> >       return result;
> >  }
> >
> > -static enum scan_result hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> > -             struct file *file, pgoff_t start, struct collapse_control *cc)
> > +static enum scan_result hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > +             unsigned long addr, struct file *file, pgoff_t start,
> > +             unsigned int *cur_progress, struct collapse_control *cc)
> >  {
> >       struct folio *folio = NULL;
> >       struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
> > @@ -2376,6 +2390,18 @@ static enum scan_result hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned
> >                       cond_resched_rcu();
> >               }
> >       }
> > +     if (cur_progress) {
> > +             unsigned long idx = xas_get_index(&xas) - start;
> > +
> > +             if (folio == NULL)
> > +                     *cur_progress += HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> > +             else if (xa_is_value(folio))
> > +                     *cur_progress += idx + (1 << xas_get_order(&xas));
> > +             else if (folio_order(folio) == HPAGE_PMD_ORDER)
> > +                     *cur_progress += idx + 1;
> > +             else
> > +                     *cur_progress += idx + folio_nr_pages(folio);
> > +     }
> >       rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> >       if (result == SCAN_SUCCEED) {
> > @@ -2456,6 +2482,7 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, enum scan_result
> >
> >               while (khugepaged_scan.address < hend) {
> >                       bool mmap_locked = true;
> > +                     unsigned int cur_progress = 0;
> >
> >                       cond_resched();
> >                       if (unlikely(hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm)))
> > @@ -2472,7 +2499,8 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, enum scan_result
> >                               mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> >                               mmap_locked = false;
> >                               *result = hpage_collapse_scan_file(mm,
> > -                                     khugepaged_scan.address, file, pgoff, cc);
> > +                                     khugepaged_scan.address, file, pgoff,
> > +                                     &cur_progress, cc);
> >                               fput(file);
> >                               if (*result == SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE) {
> >                                       mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > @@ -2486,7 +2514,8 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, enum scan_result
> >                               }
> >                       } else {
> >                               *result = hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(mm, vma,
> > -                                     khugepaged_scan.address, &mmap_locked, cc);
> > +                                     khugepaged_scan.address, &mmap_locked,
> > +                                     &cur_progress, cc);
> >                       }
> >
> >                       if (*result == SCAN_SUCCEED)
> > @@ -2494,7 +2523,7 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, enum scan_result
> >
> >                       /* move to next address */
> >                       khugepaged_scan.address += HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
> > -                     progress += HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> > +                     progress += cur_progress;
> >                       if (!mmap_locked)
> >                               /*
> >                                * We released mmap_lock so break loop.  Note
> > @@ -2817,7 +2846,7 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
> >                       mmap_locked = false;
> >                       *lock_dropped = true;
> >                       result = hpage_collapse_scan_file(mm, addr, file, pgoff,
> > -                                                       cc);
> > +                                                       NULL, cc);
> >
> >                       if (result == SCAN_PAGE_DIRTY_OR_WRITEBACK && !triggered_wb &&
> >                           mapping_can_writeback(file->f_mapping)) {
> > @@ -2832,7 +2861,7 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
> >                       fput(file);
> >               } else {
> >                       result = hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(mm, vma, addr,
> > -                                                      &mmap_locked, cc);
> > +                                                      &mmap_locked, NULL, cc);
> >               }
> >               if (!mmap_locked)
> >                       *lock_dropped = true;


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-23 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-23  8:22 [PATCH mm-new v5 0/5] Improve khugepaged scan logic Vernon Yang
2026-01-23  8:22 ` [PATCH mm-new v5 1/5] mm: khugepaged: add trace_mm_khugepaged_scan event Vernon Yang
2026-01-23 10:25   ` Dev Jain
2026-01-23  8:22 ` [PATCH mm-new v5 2/5] mm: khugepaged: refine scan progress number Vernon Yang
2026-01-23 10:46   ` Dev Jain
2026-01-23 15:25     ` Vernon Yang [this message]
2026-01-23 15:19   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-01-23 15:29     ` Vernon Yang
2026-01-28  8:29   ` Dev Jain
2026-01-28 14:34     ` Vernon Yang
2026-01-29  5:35       ` Dev Jain
2026-01-29  7:59         ` Vernon Yang
2026-01-29  8:32           ` Dev Jain
2026-01-29 12:24             ` Vernon Yang
2026-01-29 12:46               ` Dev Jain
2026-01-29  9:18         ` Lance Yang
2026-01-29 12:28           ` Vernon Yang
2026-01-23  8:22 ` [PATCH mm-new v5 3/5] mm: add folio_test_lazyfree helper Vernon Yang
2026-01-23 10:54   ` Dev Jain
2026-01-26  1:52   ` Barry Song
2026-01-23  8:22 ` [PATCH mm-new v5 4/5] mm: khugepaged: skip lazy-free folios Vernon Yang
2026-01-23  9:09   ` Lance Yang
2026-01-23 15:08     ` Vernon Yang
2026-01-23 16:32       ` Lance Yang
2026-01-24  3:22         ` Vernon Yang
2026-01-24  6:48           ` Dev Jain
2026-01-26  2:06             ` Barry Song
2026-01-23  8:22 ` [PATCH mm-new v5 5/5] mm: khugepaged: set to next mm direct when mm has MMF_DISABLE_THP_COMPLETELY Vernon Yang
2026-01-23 12:40   ` Dev Jain
2026-01-23 15:32     ` Vernon Yang
2026-01-26  2:18     ` Barry Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACZaFFN-dES3HuifdQTjfNr6P=EZQfYkt+O7V_rZ6+yC9Kf98Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=yanglincheng@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox