From: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, paul@paul-moore.com,
jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, omosnace@redhat.com,
mhocko@suse.com, ying.huang@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for set_mempolicy with a lsm prog
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:22:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACYkzJ7Eg=bG5Vr8eiXyLq+hto2KpnzhgRrw3eiJiqeJSs4w_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231208090622.4309-6-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:06 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The result as follows,
> #263/1 set_mempolicy/MPOL_BIND_without_lsm:OK
> #263/2 set_mempolicy/MPOL_DEFAULT_without_lsm:OK
> #263/3 set_mempolicy/MPOL_BIND_with_lsm:OK
> #263/4 set_mempolicy/MPOL_DEFAULT_with_lsm:OK
> #263 set_mempolicy:OK
> Summary: 1/4 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Please write a commit description on what the test actually does. I
even think of something simple that mentions a BPF LSM program that
denies all mbind with the mode MPOL_BIND and checks whether the
corresponding syscall is denied when the program is loaded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/set_mempolicy.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_set_mempolicy.c | 28 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/set_mempolicy.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_set_mempolicy.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/set_mempolicy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/set_mempolicy.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..736b5e3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/set_mempolicy.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (C) 2023 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> */
> +
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/mman.h>
> +#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include "test_set_mempolicy.skel.h"
> +
> +#define SIZE 4096
> +
> +static void mempolicy_bind(bool success)
> +{
> + unsigned long mask = 1;
> + char *addr;
> + int err;
> +
> + addr = mmap(NULL, SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(addr, "mmap"))
> + return;
> +
> + /* -lnuma is required by mbind(2), so use __NR_mbind to avoid the dependency. */
> + err = syscall(__NR_mbind, addr, SIZE, MPOL_BIND, &mask, sizeof(mask), 0);
> + if (success)
> + ASSERT_OK(err, "mbind_success");
> + else
> + ASSERT_ERR(err, "mbind_fail");
> +
> + munmap(addr, SIZE);
> +}
> +
> +static void mempolicy_default(void)
> +{
> + char *addr;
> + int err;
> +
> + addr = mmap(NULL, SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(addr, "mmap"))
> + return;
> +
> + err = syscall(__NR_mbind, addr, SIZE, MPOL_DEFAULT, NULL, 0, 0);
> + ASSERT_OK(err, "mbind_success");
> +
> + munmap(addr, SIZE);
> +}
> +
> +void test_set_mempolicy(void)
> +{
> + struct test_set_mempolicy *skel;
> + int err;
> +
> + skel = test_set_mempolicy__open();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open"))
> + return;
> +
> + skel->bss->target_pid = getpid();
> +
> + err = test_set_mempolicy__load(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "load"))
> + goto destroy;
> +
> + if (test__start_subtest("MPOL_BIND_without_lsm"))
> + mempolicy_bind(true);
> + if (test__start_subtest("MPOL_DEFAULT_without_lsm"))
> + mempolicy_default();
> +
> + /* Attach LSM prog first */
> + err = test_set_mempolicy__attach(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "attach"))
> + goto destroy;
> +
> + /* syscall to adjust memory policy */
> + if (test__start_subtest("MPOL_BIND_with_lsm"))
> + mempolicy_bind(false);
> + if (test__start_subtest("MPOL_DEFAULT_with_lsm"))
> + mempolicy_default();
> +
> +destroy:
> + test_set_mempolicy__destroy(skel);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_set_mempolicy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_set_mempolicy.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b5356d5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_set_mempolicy.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (C) 2023 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> */
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +
> +int target_pid;
> +
> +static int mem_policy_adjustment(u64 mode)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
> +
> + if (task->pid != target_pid)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (mode != MPOL_BIND)
> + return 0;
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("lsm/set_mempolicy")
> +int BPF_PROG(setmempolicy, u64 mode, u16 mode_flags, nodemask_t *nmask, u32 flags)
> +{
> + return mem_policy_adjustment(mode);
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-12 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20231208090622.4309-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20231208090622.4309-4-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
2023-12-08 17:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mm, security: Add lsm hook for memory policy adjustment Casey Schaufler
2023-12-10 2:54 ` Yafang Shao
[not found] ` <20231208090622.4309-6-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
2023-12-12 19:22 ` KP Singh [this message]
2023-12-13 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for set_mempolicy with a lsm prog Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACYkzJ7Eg=bG5Vr8eiXyLq+hto2KpnzhgRrw3eiJiqeJSs4w_w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox