From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f199.google.com (mail-qk0-f199.google.com [209.85.220.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292A46B0253 for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 05:21:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk0-f199.google.com with SMTP id a142so17710083qkb.0 for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:21:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-sor-f41.google.com (mail-sor-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id g11sor18106192qtg.144.2017.11.27.02.21.24 for (Google Transport Security); Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:21:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171124010638.GA3722@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20171123221628.8313-1-adobriyan@gmail.com> <20171123221628.8313-3-adobriyan@gmail.com> <20171124010638.GA3722@bombadil.infradead.org> From: Alexey Dobriyan Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:21:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/23] slab: create_kmalloc_cache() works with 32-bit sizes Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com On 11/24/17, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 01:16:08AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> -struct kmem_cache *__init create_kmalloc_cache(const char *name, size_t >> size, >> +struct kmem_cache *__init create_kmalloc_cache(const char *name, unsigned >> int size, >> slab_flags_t flags) > > Could you reflow this one? Surprised checkpatch didn't whinge. If it doesn't run, it doesn't whinge. :-) I think that in the era of 16:9 monitors line length should be ignored altogether. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org