From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: "Luruo, Kuthonuzo" <kuthonuzo.luruo@hpe.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kasan: improve double-free detection
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 07:34:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+bow7r43x=OR+1tyn7p_eMDKuAfH+LG1uROU2+Lc45Ctg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20E775CA4D599049A25800DE5799F6DD1F624B08@G4W3225.americas.hpqcorp.net>
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Luruo, Kuthonuzo
<kuthonuzo.luruo@hpe.com> wrote:
>> >> I missed that Alexander already landed patches that reduce header size
>> >> to 16 bytes.
>> >> It is not OK to increase them again. Please leave state as bitfield
>> >> and update it with CAS (if we introduce helper functions for state
>> >> manipulation, they will hide the CAS loop, which is nice).
>> >>
>> >
>> > Available CAS primitives/compiler do not support CAS with bitfield. I propose
>> > to change kasan_alloc_meta to:
>> >
>> > struct kasan_alloc_meta {
>> > struct kasan_track track;
>> > u16 size_delta; /* object_size - alloc size */
>> > u8 state; /* enum kasan_state */
>> > u8 reserved1;
>> > u32 reserved2;
>> > }
>> >
>> > This shrinks _used_ meta object by 1 byte wrt the original. (btw, patch v1 does
>> > not increase overall alloc meta object size). "Alloc size", where needed, is
>> > easily calculated as a delta from cache->object_size.
>>
>>
>> What is the maximum size that slab can allocate?
>> I remember seeing slabs as large as 4MB some time ago (or did I
>> confuse it with something else?). If there are such large objects,
>> that 2 bytes won't be able to hold even delta.
>> However, now on my desktop I don't see slabs larger than 16KB in
>> /proc/slabinfo.
>
> max size for SLAB's slab is 32MB; default is 4MB. I must have gotten confused by
> SLUB's 8KB limit. Anyway, new kasan_alloc_meta in patch V2:
>
> struct kasan_alloc_meta {
> struct kasan_track track;
> union {
> u8 lock;
> struct {
> u32 dummy : 8;
> u32 size_delta : 24; /* object_size - alloc size */
> };
> };
> u32 state : 2; /* enum kasan_alloc_state */
> u32 unused : 30;
> };
>
> This uses 2 more bits than current, but given the constraints I think this is
> close to optimal.
We plan to use the unused part for another depot_stack_handle_t (u32)
to memorize stack of the last call_rcu on the object (this will
greatly simplify debugging of use-after-free for objects freed by
rcu). So we need that unused part.
I would would simply put all these fields into a single u32:
struct kasan_alloc_meta {
struct kasan_track track;
u32 status; // contains lock, state and size
u32 unused; // reserved for call_rcu stack handle
};
And then separately a helper type to pack/unpack status:
union kasan_alloc_status {
u32 raw;
struct {
u32 lock : 1;
u32 state : 2;
u32 unused : 5;
u32 size : 24;
};
};
Then, when we need to read/update the header we do something like:
kasan_alloc_status status, new_status;
for (;;) {
status.raw = READ_ONCE(header->status);
// read status, form new_status, for example:
if (status.lock)
continue;
new_status.raw = status.raw;
new_status.lock = 1;
if (cas(&header->status, status.raw, new_status.raw))
break;
}
This will probably make state manipulation functions few lines longer,
but since there are like 3 such functions I don't afraid that. And we
still can use bitfield magic to extract fields and leave whole 5 bits
unused bits for future.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-05 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-02 9:49 Kuthonuzo Luruo
2016-05-02 10:09 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-05-02 11:30 ` Luruo, Kuthonuzo
2016-05-02 11:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-05-03 9:24 ` Luruo, Kuthonuzo
2016-05-03 17:50 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-05-07 10:21 ` Luruo, Kuthonuzo
2016-05-02 11:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-05-02 11:47 ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-05-03 7:58 ` Luruo, Kuthonuzo
2016-05-03 7:53 ` Luruo, Kuthonuzo
2016-05-03 17:42 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-05-04 20:13 ` Luruo, Kuthonuzo
2016-05-05 5:34 ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2016-05-05 6:23 ` Luruo, Kuthonuzo
2016-05-05 6:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-05-07 8:56 ` Luruo, Kuthonuzo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACT4Y+bow7r43x=OR+1tyn7p_eMDKuAfH+LG1uROU2+Lc45Ctg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kuthonuzo.luruo@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox