From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Victor Chibotaru <tchibo@google.com>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kcov: support comparison operands collection
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 21:08:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+bRVdvgFkkWxAZm0dv5vTQat=OhGN5cU+nAVAHA-AndfA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170830182357.GD32493@leverpostej>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> From: Victor Chibotaru <tchibo@google.com>
>>
>> Enables kcov to collect comparison operands from instrumented code.
>> This is done by using Clang's -fsanitize=trace-cmp instrumentation
>> (currently not available for GCC).
>
> What's needed to build the kernel with Clang these days?
>
> I was under the impression that it still wasn't possible to build arm64
> with clang due to a number of missing features (e.g. the %a assembler
> output template).
>
>> The comparison operands help a lot in fuzz testing. E.g. they are
>> used in Syzkaller to cover the interiors of conditional statements
>> with way less attempts and thus make previously unreachable code
>> reachable.
>>
>> To allow separate collection of coverage and comparison operands two
>> different work modes are implemented. Mode selection is now done via
>> a KCOV_ENABLE ioctl call with corresponding argument value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Victor Chibotaru <tchibo@google.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
>> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>> Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>
>> Cc: syzkaller@googlegroups.com
>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> Clang instrumentation:
>> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SanitizerCoverage.html#tracing-data-flow
>
> How stable is this?
>
> The comment at the end says "This interface is a subject to change."
The intention is that this is not subject to change anymore (since we
are using it in kernel).
I've mailed change to docs: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37303
FWIW, there is patch in flight that adds this instrumentation to gcc:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/syzkaller/CSLynn6nI-A
It seems to be stalled on review phase, though.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-30 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-30 16:23 [PATCH 0/3] " Dmitry Vyukov
2017-08-30 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Dmitry Vyukov
2017-08-30 18:23 ` Mark Rutland
2017-08-30 19:04 ` Alexander Potapenko
2017-08-30 19:08 ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2017-08-31 9:31 ` Mark Rutland
2017-09-12 17:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-08-31 13:27 ` Andrey Konovalov
[not found] ` <CAPZ9YJZUPYs8nbwG9aO1uCfr7vPY7PNr1WPpvOxP8d+vkMiDJw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-09-12 17:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-08-30 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] Makefile: support flag -fsanitizer-coverage=trace-cmp Dmitry Vyukov
2017-08-30 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] kcov: update documentation Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACT4Y+bRVdvgFkkWxAZm0dv5vTQat=OhGN5cU+nAVAHA-AndfA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tchibo@google.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox