From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f69.google.com (mail-pl0-f69.google.com [209.85.160.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6E46B0038 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 04:25:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pl0-f69.google.com with SMTP id z3so9182183pln.6 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 01:25:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-sor-f41.google.com (mail-sor-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id g16sor2362244pgn.209.2017.12.20.01.25.12 for (Google Transport Security); Wed, 20 Dec 2017 01:25:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171220092046.GE4831@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <001a11452568f5857c0560b0dc0e@google.com> <20171219130337.GU2787@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171219132209.GV2787@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171219134235.GW2787@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171220092046.GE4831@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 10:24:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in __list_del_entry_valid Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: syzbot , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , LKML , Linux-MM , Mel Gorman , Minchan Kim , Shakeel Butt , syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, ying.huang@intel.com, syzkaller On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 19-12-17 17:40:19, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> >> >> > Can we silence this duplicates [1] please? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/001a1140f57806ebef05608b25a5@google.com >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Michal, >> >> >> >> >> >> What exactly do you mean? >> >> >> >> >> >> These 2 are the same email with the same Message-ID just on different >> >> >> mailing lists. I don't see anything wrong here. >> >> > >> >> > Hmm the other one has Message-id: 001a1140f57806ebef05608b25a5@google.com >> >> > while this one has 001a11452568f5857c0560b0dc0e@google.com >> >> >> >> Ah, I see. >> >> These are reported separately because the crashes are titled >> >> differently. Kernel titled one as "general protection fault" and >> >> another as "BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference". >> > >> > Ahh, OK, so I've missed that part ;) I just thought it was duplicate >> > because the report seemed very familiar. >> >> >> So are these duplicates? If yes, we need to tell this syzbot: > > It seems so. Please tell this directly to syzbot next time. #syz dup: general protection fault in __list_del_entry_valid (2) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org