From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fork, vmalloc: KASAN-poison backing pages of vmapped stacks
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:36:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+aQUeoWnWmbDG3O2_P75f=2u=VDRA1PjuTtbJsp5Xw2VA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230117163543.1049025-1-jannh@google.com>
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 17:35, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
>
> KASAN (except in HW_TAGS mode) tracks memory state based on virtual
> addresses. The mappings of kernel stack pages in the linear mapping are
> currently marked as fully accessible.
Hi Jann,
To confirm my understanding, this is not just KASAN (except in HW_TAGS
mode), but also CONFIG_VMAP_STACK is required, right?
> Since stack corruption issues can cause some very gnarly errors, let's be
> extra careful and tell KASAN to forbid accesses to stack memory through the
> linear mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> ---
> I wrote this after seeing
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y8W5rjKdZ9erIF14@casper.infradead.org/
> and wondering about possible ways that this kind of stack corruption
> could be sneaking past KASAN.
> That's proooobably not the explanation, but still...
I think catching any silent corruptions is still very useful. Besides
confusing reports, sometimes they lead to an explosion of random
reports all over the kernel.
> include/linux/vmalloc.h | 6 ++++++
> kernel/fork.c | 10 ++++++++++
> mm/vmalloc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> index 096d48aa3437..bfb50178e5e3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> @@ -297,4 +297,10 @@ bool vmalloc_dump_obj(void *object);
> static inline bool vmalloc_dump_obj(void *object) { return false; }
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_MMU) && (defined(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) || defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS))
> +void vmalloc_poison_backing_pages(const void *addr);
> +#else
> +static inline void vmalloc_poison_backing_pages(const void *addr) {}
> +#endif
I think this should be in kasan headers and prefixed with kasan_.
There are also kmsan/kcsan that may poison memory and hw poisoning
(MADV_HWPOISON), so it's a somewhat overloaded term on its own.
Can/should this be extended to all vmalloc-ed memory? Or some of it
can be accessed via both addresses?
Also, should we mprotect it instead while it's allocated as the stack?
If it works, it looks like a reasonable improvement for
CONFIG_VMAP_STACK in general. Would also catch non-instrumented
accesses.
> #endif /* _LINUX_VMALLOC_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 9f7fe3541897..5c8c103a3597 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -321,6 +321,16 @@ static int alloc_thread_stack_node(struct task_struct *tsk, int node)
> vfree(stack);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * A virtually-allocated stack's memory should only be accessed through
> + * the vmalloc area, not through the linear mapping.
> + * Inform KASAN that all accesses through the linear mapping should be
> + * reported (instead of permitting all accesses through the linear
> + * mapping).
> + */
> + vmalloc_poison_backing_pages(stack);
> +
> /*
> * We can't call find_vm_area() in interrupt context, and
> * free_thread_stack() can be called in interrupt context,
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index ca71de7c9d77..10c79c53cf5c 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -4042,6 +4042,30 @@ void pcpu_free_vm_areas(struct vm_struct **vms, int nr_vms)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) || defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS)
> +/*
> + * Poison the KASAN shadow for the linear mapping of the pages used as stack
> + * memory.
> + * NOTE: This makes no sense in HW_TAGS mode because HW_TAGS marks physical
> + * memory, not virtual memory.
> + */
> +void vmalloc_poison_backing_pages(const void *addr)
> +{
> + struct vm_struct *area;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (WARN(!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr), "bad address (%p)\n", addr))
> + return;
> +
> + area = find_vm_area(addr);
> + if (WARN(!area, "nonexistent vm area (%p)\n", addr))
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i++)
> + kasan_poison_pages(area->pages[i], 0, false);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
> bool vmalloc_dump_obj(void *object)
> {
>
> base-commit: 5dc4c995db9eb45f6373a956eb1f69460e69e6d4
> --
> 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-17 16:35 Jann Horn
2023-01-18 7:36 ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2023-01-25 9:27 ` Jann Horn
2023-01-25 9:30 ` Jann Horn
2023-01-23 16:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-01-25 9:49 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACT4Y+aQUeoWnWmbDG3O2_P75f=2u=VDRA1PjuTtbJsp5Xw2VA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox