linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	 akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
	 syzbot <syzbot+702361cf7e3d95758761@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] KCSAN: data-race in generic_fillattr / shmem_mknod (2)
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 08:13:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+YtOXNPJSrmvs=O5UvFPjUQdnSHGhuE_kiLkxzJjH=DNQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdb1fe2d-f904-78f0-d287-5e601f789862@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

On Mon, 1 May 2023 at 07:16, Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> On 2023/04/24 17:26, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >> HEAD commit:    457391b03803 Linux 6.3
> >> git tree:       upstream
> >> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13226cf0280000
> >> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=8c81c9a3d360ebcf
> >> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=702361cf7e3d95758761
> >> compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.7, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
> >
> > I think shmem_mknod() needs to use i_size_write() to update the size.
> > Writes to i_size are not assumed to be atomic throughout the kernel
> > code.
> >
>
> I don't think that using i_size_{read,write}() alone is sufficient,
> for I think that i_size_{read,write}() needs data_race() annotation.

Agree. Or better proper READ/WRITE_ONCE.
data_race() is just an annotation, it does not fix the actual data
race bug that is present there.
I see there are lots of uses of i_size_read() in complex scenarios
that involve comparisons of the size. All such racy uses are subject
to the TOCTOU bug at least.


>  include/linux/fs.h |   13 +++++++++++--
>  mm/shmem.c         |   12 ++++++------
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 21a981680856..0d067bbe3ee9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -860,6 +860,13 @@ void filemap_invalidate_unlock_two(struct address_space *mapping1,
>   * the read or for example on x86 they can be still implemented as a
>   * cmpxchg8b without the need of the lock prefix). For SMP compiles
>   * and 64bit archs it makes no difference if preempt is enabled or not.
> + *
> + * However, when KCSAN is enabled, CPU being capable of reading/updating
> + * naturally aligned 8 bytes of memory atomically is not sufficient for
> + * avoiding KCSAN warning, for KCSAN checks whether value has changed between
> + * before and after of a read operation. But since we don't want to introduce
> + * seqcount overhead only for suppressing KCSAN warning, tell KCSAN that data
> + * race on accessing i_size field is acceptable.
>   */
>  static inline loff_t i_size_read(const struct inode *inode)
>  {
> @@ -880,7 +887,8 @@ static inline loff_t i_size_read(const struct inode *inode)
>         preempt_enable();
>         return i_size;
>  #else
> -       return inode->i_size;
> +       /* See comment above. */
> +       return data_race(inode->i_size);
>  #endif
>  }
>
> @@ -902,7 +910,8 @@ static inline void i_size_write(struct inode *inode, loff_t i_size)
>         inode->i_size = i_size;
>         preempt_enable();
>  #else
> -       inode->i_size = i_size;
> +       /* See comment above. */
> +       data_race(inode->i_size = i_size);
>  #endif
>  }
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index e40a08c5c6d7..a2f20297fb59 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -2951,7 +2951,7 @@ shmem_mknod(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
>                         goto out_iput;
>
>                 error = 0;
> -               dir->i_size += BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE;
> +               i_size_write(dir, i_size_read(dir) + BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE);
>                 dir->i_ctime = dir->i_mtime = current_time(dir);
>                 inode_inc_iversion(dir);
>                 d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
> @@ -3027,7 +3027,7 @@ static int shmem_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir, struct dentr
>                         goto out;
>         }
>
> -       dir->i_size += BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE;
> +       i_size_write(dir, i_size_read(dir) + BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE);
>         inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime = dir->i_mtime = current_time(inode);
>         inode_inc_iversion(dir);
>         inc_nlink(inode);
> @@ -3045,7 +3045,7 @@ static int shmem_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
>         if (inode->i_nlink > 1 && !S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
>                 shmem_free_inode(inode->i_sb);
>
> -       dir->i_size -= BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE;
> +       i_size_write(dir, i_size_read(dir) - BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE);
>         inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime = dir->i_mtime = current_time(inode);
>         inode_inc_iversion(dir);
>         drop_nlink(inode);
> @@ -3132,8 +3132,8 @@ static int shmem_rename2(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
>                 inc_nlink(new_dir);
>         }
>
> -       old_dir->i_size -= BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE;
> -       new_dir->i_size += BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE;
> +       i_size_write(old_dir, i_size_read(old_dir) - BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE);
> +       i_size_write(new_dir, i_size_read(new_dir) + BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE);
>         old_dir->i_ctime = old_dir->i_mtime =
>         new_dir->i_ctime = new_dir->i_mtime =
>         inode->i_ctime = current_time(old_dir);
> @@ -3189,7 +3189,7 @@ static int shmem_symlink(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
>                 folio_unlock(folio);
>                 folio_put(folio);
>         }
> -       dir->i_size += BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE;
> +       i_size_write(dir, i_size_read(dir) + BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE);
>         dir->i_ctime = dir->i_mtime = current_time(dir);
>         inode_inc_iversion(dir);
>         d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
>
> Maybe we want i_size_add() ?
>
> Also, there was a similar report on updating i_{ctime,mtime} to current_time()
> which means that i_size is not the only field that is causing data race.
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=067d40ab9ab23a6fa0a8156857ed54e295062a29
>
> Hmm, where is the serialization that avoids concurrent
> shmem_mknod()/shmem_mknod() or shmem_mknod()/shmem_unlink() ?
> i_size_write() says "need locking around it (normally i_mutex)"...
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-02 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-24  7:58 syzbot
     [not found] ` <CACT4Y+a=xWkNGw_iKibRp4ivSE8OJkWWT0VPQ4N4d1+vj0FMdg@mail.gmail.com>
2023-05-01  5:15   ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-05-01 14:05     ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-05-02 10:13       ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-05-02  6:13     ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2024-01-12 12:15 ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACT4Y+YtOXNPJSrmvs=O5UvFPjUQdnSHGhuE_kiLkxzJjH=DNQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=syzbot+702361cf7e3d95758761@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox