From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
syzbot
<bot+719398b443fd30155f92f2a888e749026c62b427@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
David Windsor <dave@nullcore.net>,
keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae, Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: bad usercopy in memdup_user
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:12:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+YC51waTR6DQE1QQMrSrdYoYnPOGvmbhGZcOieC=ccvXg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201712192308.HJJ05711.SHQFVFLOMFOOJt@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
>> >> > >> This BUG is reporting
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> [ 26.089789] usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected to 0000000022a5b430 (kmalloc-1024) (1024 bytes)
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> line. But isn't 0000000022a5b430 strange for kmalloc(1024, GFP_KERNEL)ed kernel address?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > The address is hashed (see the %p threads for 4.15).
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > +Tobin, is there a way to disable hashing entirely? The only
>> >> > designation of syzbot is providing crash reports to kernel developers
>> >> > with as much info as possible. It's fine for it to leak whatever.
>> >>
>> >> We have new specifier %px to print addresses in hex if leaking info is
>> >> not a worry.
>> >
>> > Could we have a way to know that the printed address is hashed and not just
>> > a pointer getting completely scrogged? Perhaps prefix it with ... a hash!
>> > So this line would look like:
>> >
>> > [ 26.089789] usercopy: kernel memory overwrite attempt detected to #0000000022a5b430 (kmalloc-1024) (1024 bytes)
>> >
>> > Or does that miss the point of hashing the address, so the attacker
>> > thinks its a real address?
>>
>> If we do something with this, I would suggest that we just disable
>> hashing. Any of the concerns that lead to hashed pointers are not
>> applicable in this context, moreover they are harmful, cause confusion
>> and make it harder to debug these bugs. That perfectly can be an
>> opt-in CONFIG_DEBUG_INSECURE_BLA_BLA_BLA.
>>
> Why not a kernel command line option? Hashing by default.
Would work for continuous testing systems too.
I just thought that since it has security implications, a config would
be more reliable. Say if a particular distribution builds kernel
without this config, then there is no way to enable it on the fly,
intentionally or not.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-19 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-18 13:40 syzbot
2017-12-18 14:22 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-19 0:57 ` Kees Cook
2017-12-19 8:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-12-19 8:37 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-12-19 8:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-12-19 9:04 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-12-19 9:07 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-12-19 13:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 13:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-12-19 14:08 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-19 14:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2017-12-19 20:45 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-12-19 20:33 ` Tobin C. Harding
2017-12-19 21:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-19 21:48 ` Al Viro
2017-12-19 22:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2017-12-19 23:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-20 3:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20 4:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-20 4:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-20 9:44 ` David Laight
2017-12-31 8:11 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-12-19 21:54 ` Kees Cook
2017-12-19 22:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 22:24 ` Laura Abbott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACT4Y+YC51waTR6DQE1QQMrSrdYoYnPOGvmbhGZcOieC=ccvXg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=bot+719398b443fd30155f92f2a888e749026c62b427@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=dave@nullcore.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=keun-o.park@darkmatter.ae \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox