From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com (mail-vc0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3056B0036 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 01:11:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id lg15so1647236vcb.40 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:11:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vc0-x232.google.com (mail-vc0-x232.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id xn5si1481582vdc.68.2014.02.28.22.11.07 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:11:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id ik5so1676180vcb.37 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:11:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140228174150.8ff4edca.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1393625931-2858-1-git-send-email-quning@google.com> <20140228174150.8ff4edca.akpm@linux-foundation.org> From: Ning Qu Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:10:27 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] mm, shmem: map few pages around fault address if they are in page cache Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Hugh Dickins , Andi Kleen , Matthew Wilcox , Dave Hansen , Alexander Viro , Dave Chinner , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yes, I am using the iozone -i 0 -i 1. Let me try the most simple test as you mentioned. Best wishes, -- Ning Qu On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:35:16 -0800 Ning Qu wrote: > >> Sorry about my fault about the experiments, here is the real one. >> >> Btw, apparently, there are still some questions about the results and >> I will sync with Kirill about his test command line. >> >> Below is just some simple experiment numbers from this patch, let me know if >> you would like more: >> >> Tested on Xeon machine with 64GiB of RAM, using the current default fault >> order 4. >> >> Sequential access 8GiB file >> Baseline with-patch >> 1 thread >> minor fault 8,389,052 4,456,530 >> time, seconds 9.55 8.31 > > The numbers still seem wrong. I'd expect to see almost exactly 2M minor > faults with this test. > > Looky: > > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > > #define G (1024 * 1024 * 1024) > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > { > char *p; > int fd; > unsigned long idx; > int sum = 0; > > fd = open("foo", O_RDONLY); > if (fd < 0) { > perror("open"); > exit(1); > } > p = mmap(NULL, 1 * G, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0); > if (p == MAP_FAILED) { > perror("mmap"); > exit(1); > } > > for (idx = 0; idx < 1 * G; idx += 4096) > sum += p[idx]; > printf("%d\n", sum); > exit(0); > } > > z:/home/akpm> /usr/bin/time ./a.out > 0 > 0.05user 0.33system 0:00.38elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4195856maxresident)k > 0inputs+0outputs (0major+262264minor)pagefaults 0swaps > > z:/home/akpm> dc > 16o > 262264 4 * p > 1001E0 > > That's close! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org