linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai@gmail.com>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 06/10] Per-memcg background reclaim.
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:14:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC8teKVquCsdoyg6qJ-Cre0STLqHov7sDwEgB+nJ71-_T+F__w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303185466-2532-7-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com>

2011/4/19 Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>:
> This is the main loop of per-memcg background reclaim which is implemented in
> function balance_mem_cgroup_pgdat().
>
> The function performs a priority loop similar to global reclaim. During each
> iteration it invokes balance_pgdat_node() for all nodes on the system, which
> is another new function performs background reclaim per node. After reclaiming
> each node, it checks mem_cgroup_watermark_ok() and breaks the priority loop if
> it returns true.
>
> changelog v6..v5:
> 1. add mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages()
> 2. fix some comment style.
>
> changelog v5..v4:
> 1. remove duplicate check on nodes_empty()
> 2. add logic to check if the per-memcg lru is empty on the zone.
>
> changelog v4..v3:
> 1. split the select_victim_node and zone_unreclaimable to a seperate patches
> 2. remove the logic tries to do zone balancing.
>
> changelog v3..v2:
> 1. change mz->all_unreclaimable to be boolean.
> 2. define ZONE_RECLAIMABLE_RATE macro shared by zone and per-memcg reclaim.
> 3. some more clean-up.
>
> changelog v2..v1:
> 1. move the per-memcg per-zone clear_unreclaimable into uncharge stage.
> 2. shared the kswapd_run/kswapd_stop for per-memcg and global background
> reclaim.
> 3. name the per-memcg memcg as "memcg-id" (css->id). And the global kswapd
> keeps the same name.
> 4. fix a race on kswapd_stop while the per-memcg-per-zone info could be accessed
> after freeing.
> 5. add the fairness in zonelist where memcg remember the last zone reclaimed
> from.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |    9 +++
>  mm/memcontrol.c            |   18 +++++
>  mm/vmscan.c                |  151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index d4ff7f2..a4747b0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>  */
>  int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>  int mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> +unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +                                                 struct zone *zone);
>  unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>                                       struct zone *zone,
>                                       enum lru_list lru);
> @@ -311,6 +313,13 @@ mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  }
>
>  static inline unsigned long
> +mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +                                   struct zone *zone)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long
>  mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone,
>                         enum lru_list lru)
>  {
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 06fddd2..7490147 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1097,6 +1097,24 @@ int mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>        return (active > inactive);
>  }
>
> +unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +                                               struct zone *zone)
> +{
> +       int nr;
> +       int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> +       int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> +       struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(memcg, nid, zid);
> +
> +       nr = MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
> +            MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
> +
> +       if (nr_swap_pages > 0)

Do we also need to check memcg->memsw_is_minimum here? That's to say,
       if (nr_swap_pages > 0 && !memcg->memsw_is_minimum)
                        .....
--
Thanks,
Zhu Yanhai

> +               nr += MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, NR_ACTIVE_ANON) +
> +                     MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
> +
> +       return nr;
> +}
> +
>  unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>                                       struct zone *zone,
>                                       enum lru_list lru)
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 0060d1e..2a5c734 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
>
>  #include <linux/swapops.h>
>
> +#include <linux/res_counter.h>
> +
>  #include "internal.h"
>
>  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> @@ -111,6 +113,8 @@ struct scan_control {
>         * are scanned.
>         */
>        nodemask_t      *nodemask;
> +
> +       int priority;
>  };
>
>  #define lru_to_page(_head) (list_entry((_head)->prev, struct page, lru))
> @@ -2625,11 +2629,158 @@ out:
>        finish_wait(wait_h, &wait);
>  }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> +/*
> + * The function is used for per-memcg LRU. It scanns all the zones of the
> + * node and returns the nr_scanned and nr_reclaimed.
> + */
> +static void balance_pgdat_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> +                                       struct scan_control *sc)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +       unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
> +       struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont = sc->mem_cgroup;
> +       int priority = sc->priority;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * This dma->highmem order is consistant with global reclaim.
> +        * We do this because the page allocator works in the opposite
> +        * direction although memcg user pages are mostly allocated at
> +        * highmem.
> +        */
> +       for (i = 0; i < pgdat->nr_zones; i++) {
> +               struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> +               unsigned long scan = 0;
> +
> +               scan = mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages(mem_cont, zone);
> +               if (!scan)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               sc->nr_scanned = 0;
> +               shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
> +               total_scanned += sc->nr_scanned;
> +
> +               /*
> +                * If we've done a decent amount of scanning and
> +                * the reclaim ratio is low, start doing writepage
> +                * even in laptop mode
> +                */
> +               if (total_scanned > SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX * 2 &&
> +                   total_scanned > sc->nr_reclaimed + sc->nr_reclaimed / 2) {
> +                       sc->may_writepage = 1;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       sc->nr_scanned = total_scanned;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Per cgroup background reclaim.
> + * TODO: Take off the order since memcg always do order 0
> + */
> +static unsigned long balance_mem_cgroup_pgdat(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
> +                                             int order)
> +{
> +       int i, nid;
> +       int start_node;
> +       int priority;
> +       bool wmark_ok;
> +       int loop;
> +       pg_data_t *pgdat;
> +       nodemask_t do_nodes;
> +       unsigned long total_scanned;
> +       struct scan_control sc = {
> +               .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> +               .may_unmap = 1,
> +               .may_swap = 1,
> +               .nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> +               .swappiness = vm_swappiness,
> +               .order = order,
> +               .mem_cgroup = mem_cont,
> +       };
> +
> +loop_again:
> +       do_nodes = NODE_MASK_NONE;
> +       sc.may_writepage = !laptop_mode;
> +       sc.nr_reclaimed = 0;
> +       total_scanned = 0;
> +
> +       for (priority = DEF_PRIORITY; priority >= 0; priority--) {
> +               sc.priority = priority;
> +               wmark_ok = false;
> +               loop = 0;
> +
> +               /* The swap token gets in the way of swapout... */
> +               if (!priority)
> +                       disable_swap_token();
> +
> +               if (priority == DEF_PRIORITY)
> +                       do_nodes = node_states[N_ONLINE];
> +
> +               while (1) {
> +                       nid = mem_cgroup_select_victim_node(mem_cont,
> +                                                       &do_nodes);
> +
> +                       /*
> +                        * Indicate we have cycled the nodelist once
> +                        * TODO: we might add MAX_RECLAIM_LOOP for preventing
> +                        * kswapd burning cpu cycles.
> +                        */
> +                       if (loop == 0) {
> +                               start_node = nid;
> +                               loop++;
> +                       } else if (nid == start_node)
> +                               break;
> +
> +                       pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> +                       balance_pgdat_node(pgdat, order, &sc);
> +                       total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned;
> +
> +                       for (i = pgdat->nr_zones - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> +                               struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> +
> +                               if (!populated_zone(zone))
> +                                       continue;
> +                       }
> +                       if (i < 0)
> +                               node_clear(nid, do_nodes);
> +
> +                       if (mem_cgroup_watermark_ok(mem_cont,
> +                                                       CHARGE_WMARK_HIGH)) {
> +                               wmark_ok = true;
> +                               goto out;
> +                       }
> +
> +                       if (nodes_empty(do_nodes)) {
> +                               wmark_ok = true;
> +                               goto out;
> +                       }
> +               }
> +
> +               if (total_scanned && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
> +                       congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
> +
> +               if (sc.nr_reclaimed >= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> +                       break;
> +       }
> +out:
> +       if (!wmark_ok) {
> +               cond_resched();
> +
> +               try_to_freeze();
> +
> +               goto loop_again;
> +       }
> +
> +       return sc.nr_reclaimed;
> +}
> +#else
>  static unsigned long balance_mem_cgroup_pgdat(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
>                                                        int order)
>  {
>        return 0;
>  }
> +#endif
>
>  /*
>  * The background pageout daemon, started as a kernel thread
> --
> 1.7.3.1
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-19  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-19  3:57 [PATCH V6 00/10] memcg: per cgroup " Ying Han
2011-04-19  3:57 ` [PATCH V6 01/10] Add kswapd descriptor Ying Han
2011-04-19  3:57 ` [PATCH V6 02/10] Add per memcg reclaim watermarks Ying Han
2011-04-19  3:57 ` [PATCH V6 03/10] New APIs to adjust per-memcg wmarks Ying Han
2011-04-19  3:57 ` [PATCH V6 04/10] Infrastructure to support per-memcg reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-19  3:57 ` [PATCH V6 05/10] Implement the select_victim_node within memcg Ying Han
2011-04-19  3:57 ` [PATCH V6 06/10] Per-memcg background reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-20  1:03   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-20  3:25     ` Ying Han
2011-04-20  4:20     ` Ying Han
2012-03-19  8:14   ` Zhu Yanhai [this message]
2012-03-20  5:37     ` Ying Han
2011-04-19  3:57 ` [PATCH V6 07/10] Add per-memcg zone "unreclaimable" Ying Han
2011-04-19  3:57 ` [PATCH V6 08/10] Enable per-memcg background reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-19  3:57 ` [PATCH V6 09/10] Add API to export per-memcg kswapd pid Ying Han
2011-04-20  1:15   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-20  3:39     ` Ying Han
2011-04-19  3:57 ` [PATCH V6 10/10] Add some per-memcg stats Ying Han
2011-04-21  2:51 ` [PATCH V6 00/10] memcg: per cgroup background reclaim Johannes Weiner
2011-04-21  3:05   ` Ying Han
2011-04-21  3:53     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-04-21  4:00   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-21  4:24     ` Ying Han
2011-04-21  4:46       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-21  5:08     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-04-21  5:28       ` Ying Han
2011-04-23  1:35         ` Johannes Weiner
2011-04-23  2:10           ` Ying Han
2011-04-23  2:34             ` Johannes Weiner
2011-04-23  3:33               ` Ying Han
2011-04-23  3:41                 ` Rik van Riel
2011-04-23  3:49                   ` Ying Han
2011-04-27  7:36                 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-04-27 17:41                   ` Ying Han
2011-04-27 21:37                     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-04-21  5:41       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-21  6:23         ` Ying Han
2011-04-23  2:02         ` Johannes Weiner
2011-04-21  3:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-21  3:48   ` [PATCH 2/3] weight for memcg background reclaim (Was " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-21  6:11     ` Ying Han
2011-04-21  6:38       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-21  6:59         ` Ying Han
2011-04-21  7:01           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-21  7:12             ` Ying Han
2011-04-21  3:50   ` [PATCH 3/3/] fix mem_cgroup_watemark_ok " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-21  5:29     ` Ying Han
2011-04-21  4:22   ` Ying Han
2011-04-21  4:27     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-21  4:31     ` Ying Han
2011-04-21  3:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] memcg kswapd thread pool (Was " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-21  7:09   ` Ying Han
2011-04-21  7:14     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-21  8:10   ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-21  8:46     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-21  9:05       ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-21 16:56         ` Ying Han
2011-04-22  1:02           ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAC8teKVquCsdoyg6qJ-Cre0STLqHov7sDwEgB+nJ71-_T+F__w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=zhu.yanhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox