From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org,
jannh@google.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org,
avagin@gmail.com, benjamin@sipsolutions.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, jorgelo@chromium.org, sroettger@google.com,
hch@lst.de, ojeda@kernel.org, thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de,
adobriyan@gmail.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
pedro.falcato@gmail.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, willy@infradead.org,
anna-maria@linutronix.de, mark.rutland@arm.com,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, Jason@zx2c4.com, deller@gmx.de,
rdunlap@infradead.org, davem@davemloft.net, peterx@redhat.com,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, gerg@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
mhocko@suse.com, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org,
ardb@google.com, enh@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
groeck@chromium.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com, mike.rapoport@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/7] mseal, system mappings: uprobe mapping
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:06:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABi2SkVRG8-j7T30tFQySOU9G8Lvyxqf_aRTrE2KXhj9GeBOkw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55a9ff15-c72e-45cb-ab38-ad814011e27e@lucifer.local>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:24 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:52:45PM +0000, jeffxu@chromium.org wrote:
> > From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>
> >
> > Provide support to mseal the uprobe mapping.
> >
> > Unlike other system mappings, the uprobe mapping is not
> > established during program startup. However, its lifetime is the same
> > as the process's lifetime. It could be sealed from creation.
> >
>
> I thought we agreed not to enable this for now? What testing
> have you done to ensure this is functional?
>
I honestly don't know much about uprobe. I don't recall that I agree
to ignore that though.
As indicated in the cover letter, it is my understanding that uprobe's
mapping's lifetime are the same as process's lifetime, thus sealable.
[1]
Oleg Nesterov, also cc, seems OK with mseal it in the early version of
this patch [2]
Are there any potential downsides of doing this? If yes, I can remove it.
I'm also looking at Oleg to give more guidance on this :-), or if
there are some functional tests that I need to do for uprobe.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241005200741.GA24353@redhat.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241005200741.GA24353@redhat.com/
> I mean is this literally _all_ uprobe mappings now being sealed?
>
> I'd really like some more assurances on this one. And what are you
> mitigating by sealing these? I get VDSO (kinda) but uprobes?
>
> You really need to provide more justification here.
Sure. In our threat model, we need to seal all r-x, r--, and --x
mappings to prevent them from becoming writable. This applies to all
mappings, regardless of whether they're created by the kernel or
dynamic linker.
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/events/uprobes.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > index 2ca797cbe465..8dcdfa0d306b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > @@ -1662,6 +1662,7 @@ static const struct vm_special_mapping xol_mapping = {
> > static int xol_add_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, struct xol_area *area)
> > {
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > + unsigned long vm_flags;
> > int ret;
> >
> > if (mmap_write_lock_killable(mm))
> > @@ -1682,8 +1683,10 @@ static int xol_add_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, struct xol_area *area)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + vm_flags = VM_EXEC|VM_MAYEXEC|VM_DONTCOPY|VM_IO;
> > + vm_flags |= VM_SEALED_SYSMAP;
> > vma = _install_special_mapping(mm, area->vaddr, PAGE_SIZE,
> > - VM_EXEC|VM_MAYEXEC|VM_DONTCOPY|VM_IO,
> > + vm_flags,
> > &xol_mapping);
> > if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
> > ret = PTR_ERR(vma);
> > --
> > 2.48.1.658.g4767266eb4-goog
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-24 22:52 [PATCH v7 0/7] mseal system mappings jeffxu
2025-02-24 22:52 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] mseal, system mappings: kernel config and header change jeffxu
2025-02-25 6:05 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-26 1:33 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-26 6:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-28 0:04 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-28 10:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-25 15:22 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-25 15:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-26 0:04 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-24 22:52 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] selftests: x86: test_mremap_vdso: skip if vdso is msealed jeffxu
2025-02-25 6:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-25 22:37 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-26 5:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-24 22:52 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] mseal, system mappings: enable x86-64 jeffxu
2025-02-25 1:03 ` Kees Cook
2025-02-26 0:21 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-25 8:08 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-26 0:48 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-26 7:35 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-02-27 21:44 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-24 22:52 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] mseal, system mappings: enable arm64 jeffxu
2025-02-25 6:20 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-25 22:26 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-26 5:25 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-26 17:11 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-26 17:17 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-26 17:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-26 18:14 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-28 0:48 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-28 10:31 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-24 22:52 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] mseal, system mappings: enable uml architecture jeffxu
2025-02-25 6:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-25 8:45 ` Berg, Benjamin
2025-02-25 10:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-25 12:24 ` Benjamin Berg
2025-02-25 13:41 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-25 13:59 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-25 15:06 ` Kees Cook
2025-02-25 15:31 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-25 18:38 ` Kees Cook
2025-02-26 0:00 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-24 22:52 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] mseal, system mappings: uprobe mapping jeffxu
2025-02-25 6:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-26 0:06 ` Jeff Xu [this message]
2025-02-26 5:57 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-26 16:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-26 16:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-26 16:45 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-26 18:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-26 18:06 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-26 18:19 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-26 18:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-26 18:25 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-27 23:38 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-28 10:39 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-27 21:48 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-24 22:52 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] mseal, system mappings: update mseal.rst jeffxu
2025-02-24 23:03 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] mseal system mappings Pedro Falcato
2025-02-24 23:07 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-25 6:09 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-25 10:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-26 0:17 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-26 6:00 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-27 23:43 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-28 10:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-25 15:18 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-26 0:12 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-26 5:42 ` your mail Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-28 0:55 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-28 9:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-28 17:24 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-28 17:30 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABi2SkVRG8-j7T30tFQySOU9G8Lvyxqf_aRTrE2KXhj9GeBOkw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jeffxu@chromium.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=ardb@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=avagin@gmail.com \
--cc=benjamin@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=enh@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gerg@kernel.org \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jorgelo@chromium.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.rapoport@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pedro.falcato@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sroettger@google.com \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox