From: Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xdel.ru>
To: Christian Marie <christian@ponies.io>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: isolate_freepages_block and excessive CPU usage by OSD process
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:03:44 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABYiri99WAj+6hfTq+6x+_w0=VNgBua8N9+mOvU6o5bynukPLQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141119012110.GA2608@cucumber.iinet.net.au>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Christian Marie <christian@ponies.io> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I had found recently that the OSD daemons under certain conditions
>> (moderate vm pressure, moderate I/O, slightly altered vm settings) can
>> go into loop involving isolate_freepages and effectively hit Ceph
>> cluster performance.
>
> Hi! I'm the creator of the server fault issue you reference:
>
> http://serverfault.com/questions/642883/cause-of-page-fragmentation-on-large-server-with-xfs-20-disks-and-ceph
>
> I'd like to get to the bottom of this very much, I'm seeing a very similar
> pattern on 3.10.0-123.9.3.el7.x86_64, if this is fixed in later versions
> perhaps we could backport something.
>
> Here is some perf output:
>
> http://ponies.io/raw/compaction.png
>
> Looks pretty similar. I also have hundreds of MB logs and traces should we need
> some specific question answered.
>
> I've managed to reproduce many failed compactions with this:
>
> https://gist.github.com/christian-marie/cde7e80c5edb889da541
>
> I took some compaction stress test code and bolted on a little loop to mmap a
> large sparse file and read every PAGE_SIZEth byte.
>
> Run it once, compactions seem to do okay, run it again and they're really slow.
> This seems to be because my little trick to fill up cache memory only seems to
> work exactly half the time. Note that transhuge pages are only used to
> introduce fragmentation/pressure here, turning transparent huge pages off
> doesn't seem to make the slightest difference to the spinning-in-reclaim issue.
>
> We are using Mellanox ipoib drivers which do not do scatter-gather, so I'm
> currently working on adding support for that (the hardware supports it). Are
> you also using ipoib or have something else doing high order allocations? It's
> a bit concerning for me if you don't as it would suggest that cutting down on
> those allocations won't help.
So do I. On a test environment with regular tengig cards I was unable
to reproduce the issue. Honestly, I thought that almost every
contemporary driver for high-speed cards is working with
scatter-gather, so I had not mlx in mind as a potential cause of this
problem from very beginning. There are a couple of reports in ceph
lists, complaining for OSD flapping/unresponsiveness without clear
reason on certain (not always clear though) conditions which may have
same root cause. Wonder if numad-like mechanism will help there, but
its usage is generally an anti-performance pattern in my experience.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-19 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CABYiri-do2YdfBx=r+u1kwXkEwN4v+yeRSHB-ODXo4gMFgW-Fg.mail.gmail.com>
2014-11-19 1:21 ` Christian Marie
2014-11-19 18:03 ` Andrey Korolyov [this message]
2014-11-19 21:20 ` Christian Marie
2014-11-19 23:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-11-19 23:49 ` Andrey Korolyov
2014-11-20 3:30 ` Christian Marie
2014-11-21 2:35 ` Christian Marie
2014-11-23 9:33 ` Christian Marie
2014-11-24 21:48 ` Andrey Korolyov
2014-11-28 8:03 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-11-28 9:26 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-12-01 8:31 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-12-02 1:47 ` Christian Marie
2014-12-02 4:53 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-12-02 5:06 ` Christian Marie
2014-12-03 4:04 ` Christian Marie
2014-12-03 8:05 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-12-04 23:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-12-05 5:50 ` Christian Marie
2014-12-03 7:57 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-12-04 7:30 ` Christian Marie
2014-12-04 7:51 ` Christian Marie
2014-12-05 1:07 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-12-05 5:55 ` Christian Marie
2014-12-08 7:19 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-12-10 15:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-12-11 3:08 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-12-02 15:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-12-03 7:49 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-12-03 12:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-12-04 6:53 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-11-15 11:48 Andrey Korolyov
2014-11-15 16:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-11-15 17:10 ` Andrey Korolyov
2014-11-15 18:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-11-15 18:52 ` Andrey Korolyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABYiri99WAj+6hfTq+6x+_w0=VNgBua8N9+mOvU6o5bynukPLQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=andrey@xdel.ru \
--cc=christian@ponies.io \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox