Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] list: test: Mending tests for list_cut_position()

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] list: test: Mending tests for list_cut_position()

[David Gow]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2112 bytes --]

On Tue, 10 Sept 2024 at 12:35, I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Mending test for list_cut_position*() for the missing check of integer
> "i" after the second loop. The variable should be checked for second
> time to make sure both lists after the cut operation are formed as
> expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
> ---

Alas, this breaks the list test, as we're comparing the entries we get
from list_for_each() with entries[i], so changing the value of 'i'
will compare against the wrong elements.

You could either update the KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ at the bottom to verify
the _total_ number of elements (which should be fine, as we already
verify the value of i after the first loop), or compare each entry
against, e.g., &entries[2 + i].

This is causing a test failure on -next:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202409161554.6c3e8d5d-oliver.sang@intel.com/

Could we remove this from mm-nonmm pending a fix?

Cheers,
-- David

>  lib/list-test.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/list-test.c b/lib/list-test.c
> index 37cbc33e9fdb..8d1d47a9fe9e 100644
> --- a/lib/list-test.c
> +++ b/lib/list-test.c
> @@ -404,10 +404,13 @@ static void list_test_list_cut_position(struct kunit *test)
>
>         KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 2);
>
> +       i = 0;
>         list_for_each(cur, &list1) {
>                 KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]);

Either change this to &entries[2 + i], or...

>                 i++;
>         }
> +
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 1);

This to expect i == 3

>  }
>
>  static void list_test_list_cut_before(struct kunit *test)
> @@ -432,10 +435,13 @@ static void list_test_list_cut_before(struct kunit *test)
>
>         KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 1);
>
> +       i = 0;
>         list_for_each(cur, &list1) {
>                 KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]);

Either change this to &entries[1 + i], or...

>                 i++;
>         }
> +
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 2);

This to expect i == 3.

>  }
>
>  static void list_test_list_splice(struct kunit *test)
> --
> 2.43.0
>

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5294 bytes --]