From: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: honggyu.kim@sk.com, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/damon: update expired description of damos_action
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2025 21:44:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABFDxMGUO88-CkHa8E79TTkoEm_j5FX3ZBVjChXJ5w0eL3mNSA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250801170231.8532-1-sj@kernel.org>
On Sat, Aug 2, 2025 at 2:02 AM SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 00:34:30 +0900 Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, SeongJae
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 2:58 AM SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Sang-Heon,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 22:22:30 +0900 Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Nowadays, damos operation actions support more various operation set.
> > > > But comments(also, generated documentation) doesn't updated.
> > > > So, fix the comments with current support status.
> > >
> > > Thank you for catching this and fixing!
> >
> > :)
> >
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > I also found below patch(https://lore.kernel.org/damon/20250730200239.60984-1-sj@kernel.org/T/#t)
> > > > So, Is it means that DAMOS_STAT is only supported by paddr now?
> > >
> > > No. 'vaddr' supports DAMOS_STAT. The patch is not adding DAMOS_STAT support
> > > on vaddr, but extending the support for DAMOS filters.
> > >
> > > Thank you for checking the thread and asking this question, though. I see this
> > > as an important signal of another rooms to improve on the documentation.
> >
> > Thanks for your kind review. I really don't want to bother you
> > anymore. But I would like to check my understanding.
>
> No worry, questions about DAMON never bother me.
>
> >
> > So the basic operation of stat is covered by outside of
> > `damon_pa_apply_scheme` and `damon_va_apply_scheme`.
> > If it's not too much trouble, could you point me to where they are?
>
> It is covered by damos_update_stat() in core.c file.
Oh, I see, Now I can understand the flow more deeply :)
> >
> > And some extension stat (maybe it only renewed that filter exists) is
> > covered inside of upper functions. Is it also right point?
>
> Depending on what you mean with "upper functions".
>
> damos_apply_scheme() in DAMON core layer calls
> damon_operationss->apply_scheme() callback of the current operations set. The
> callback may handle DAMOS filters or not. The callback of paddr.c handles the
> filters for DAMOS_STAT. The callback of vaddr.c does not, and Pan is extending
> it to handle filters.
Oh, I see. Thanks to your help, Now i figure out the flow from
sysfs(or directly set) to damon_select_ops().
> [...]
> > So, I think that I need to send v2 patch, If that's right, which way
> > would you prefer?
> > reply to this thread or make a new thread?
>
> I prefer making a new thread :)
>
When the discussion of "reclaim" finishes, I'll make v2 patch as soon
as possible.
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
> [...]
Thanks for your kindness.
Best Regards.
Sang-Heon Jeon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-03 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-31 13:22 Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-07-31 17:58 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-01 11:35 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-08-01 16:11 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-01 16:50 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-03 2:03 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-08-03 4:22 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-03 4:43 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-08-03 5:30 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-03 5:41 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-08-03 13:22 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-03 17:42 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-04 12:56 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-05 2:07 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-08-01 15:34 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-01 17:02 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-03 12:44 ` Sang-Heon Jeon [this message]
2025-08-03 17:44 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABFDxMGUO88-CkHa8E79TTkoEm_j5FX3ZBVjChXJ5w0eL3mNSA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ekffu200098@gmail.com \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox