From: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: honggyu.kim@sk.com, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests/damon: test no-op commit broke DAMON status
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 14:43:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABFDxMG-2+VQvWNHqCLKy4jZXBJzsWPS9DOkV-gfYovF5Xo-Jg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250809173559.71327-1-sj@kernel.org>
Hi SeongJae
On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 2:36 AM SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2025 15:39:41 +0900 Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi SeongJae
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 9, 2025 at 7:05 AM SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Sang-Heon,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 9 Aug 2025 04:55:17 +0900 Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Add test to verify that DAMON status is not changed after a no-op
> > > > commit.
> > >
> > > Thank you for this patch! I have some comments below, though.
> > >
> > > > Currently, it is failing. but after fix the bug it should be
> > > > success.
> > >
> > > To keep bisecting goes smoothly, let's introduce failing tests _after_ their
> > > fixes are landed.
> >
> > I see. As mentioned in another comment, I'll merge this patch set into
> > one patch. I think this comment will be resolved then.
>
> That could make the patch be unnecessarily difficult to apply on older kernels
> due to the test part. Please keep those separated.
Oh, I misunderstand your previous comment. Now, I understand your
point. I'll separate them back and make two v3 patch(one for fix bug,
one for test) not a patch set.
Thanks for the explanation, I feel like I'm learning more and more.
> [...]
> > > > + if rc != 0:
> > > > + return None, f'drgn fail : return code({rc})'
> > >
> > > Let's not add a space before ':', for the consistency.
> >
> > I see. I made so many mistakes like these; (I worked this very late
> > night...) I will fix them all. Thank you for checking this moment.
>
> I'm sorry to hear that you had to work on late night :'( I hope you to have
> sufficient rests.
Never mind. just I went with that :) Thanks as always.
> [...]
> > To be honest, I didn't use kselftest framework while making these
> > patch set because I don't know how kernel developers use it.
> >
> > If you are okay, could you share how you use it?
>
> Sure. I do below for running DAMON selftests.
>
> $ sudo make -C tools/testing/selftests/damon run_tsets
>
> You could also run DAMON kunit tests like below.
>
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig mm/damon/tests/
Thanks for sharing. I'll try it with my vm environment.
> I usually run all those together with additional tests, using DAMON tests
> suite[2].
>
> > I just build kernel
> > with custom patch, and execute output images by vm, and setup env,
> > then just execute tests(it's so raw.. i know)
>
> It's ok. No one fits all, so different tests are needed for different hacks.
> Please keep using whatever works best for you :)
You're so right. Maybe I just want to learn some tips from the experts. haha
> >
> > Maybe is there a kernel build option that automatically includes tests
> > to output image? Or just a general or smarter way to execute the whole
> > test?
>
> To be honest I'm also not an expert of kselftest and kunit :) You coule refer
> to the kselftest documentation[1] for more details.
Thanks for sharing!
> [...]
> > Thanks for reviewing! Have a nice weekend. I'll do this job after my
> > personal schedule finishes.
>
> No worry, take your time and fun! :)
> [...]
:)
> [1] https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/kselftest.html
> [2] https://github.com/damonitor/damon-tests/blob/master/corr/run.sh
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
Best Regards.
Sang-Heon Jeon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-10 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-08 19:55 [PATCH 0/2] fix damos_commit_ops_filters iteration problem with Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-08 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests/damon: test no-op commit broke DAMON status Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-08 22:05 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-09 6:27 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-09 6:39 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-09 17:35 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-10 5:43 ` Sang-Heon Jeon [this message]
2025-08-08 19:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/core : fix commit_ops_filters by using correct nth function Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-08 22:08 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-08 23:26 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABFDxMG-2+VQvWNHqCLKy4jZXBJzsWPS9DOkV-gfYovF5Xo-Jg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ekffu200098@gmail.com \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox