From: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: honggyu.kim@sk.com, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/damon/core: set quota->charged_from to jiffies at first charge window
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 01:18:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABFDxMFy18rb3K0NYYKifsBVD8MoA=O5Aj=g+KS5gR1R9GCEdQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250821155833.57597-1-sj@kernel.org>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 12:58 AM SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 20:06:58 +0900 Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 2:41 PM SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> [...]
> > > Let's restart. Could you please rewrite the commit log for this patch and send
> > > the draft as a reply to this?
> > >
> > > We can further discuss on the new draft if it has more things to improve. And
> > > once the discussion is finalized, you can post v4 of this patch with the
> > > updated commit message.
> >
> > Good Idea. This is the draft for commit message. Also, Thank you for
> > your patience and understanding.
>
> Thank you for accepting my humble suggestion.
>
> >
> > Kernel initialize "jiffies" timer as 5 minutes below zero, as shown in
> > include/linux/jiffies.h
> >
> > /*
> > * Have the 32 bit jiffies value wrap 5 minutes after boot
> > * so jiffies wrap bugs show up earlier.
> > */
> > #define INITIAL_JIFFIES ((unsigned long)(unsigned int) (-300*HZ))
> >
> > And jiffies comparison help functions cast unsigned value to signed to
> > cover wraparound
> >
> > #define time_after_eq(a,b) \
> > (typecheck(unsigned long, a) && \
> > typecheck(unsigned long, b) && \
> > ((long)((a) - (b)) >= 0))
> >
> > When quota->charged_from is initialized to 0, time_after_eq() can incorrectly
> > return FALSE even after reset_interval has elapsed. This occurs when
> > (jiffies - reset_interval) produces a value with MSB=1, which is interpreted
> > as negative in signed arithmetic.
> >
> > This issue primarily affects 32-bit systems because:
> > On 64-bit systems: MSB=1 values occur after ~292 million years from boot
> > (assuming HZ=1000), almost impossible.
> >
> > On 32-bit systems: MSB=1 values occur during the first 5 minutes after boot,
> > and the second half of every jiffies wraparound cycle, starting from day 25
> > (assuming HZ=1000)
> >
> > When above unexpected FALSE return from time_after_eq() occurs, the
> > charging window will not reset. The user impact depends on esz value
> > at that time.
> >
> > If esz is 0, scheme ignores configured quotas and runs without any
> > limits.
> >
> > If esz is not 0, scheme stops working once the quota is exhausted. It
> > remains until the charging window finally resets.
> >
> > So, change quota->charged_from to jiffies at damos_adjust_quota() when
> > it is considered as the first charge window. By this change, we can avoid
> > unexpected FALSE return from time_after_eq()
>
> This new draft looks good to me. I find nothing to further modify. Could you
> please send v3 of this patch with the above commit log?
I'm really glad to hear that! Your thoughtful comments really brought
this together.
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
> [...]
Best Regards
Sang-Heon Jeon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-21 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-19 15:01 Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-19 17:27 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-19 18:03 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-20 13:18 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-20 18:27 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21 1:08 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-21 2:54 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21 4:29 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-21 4:43 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-21 5:41 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21 5:43 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21 11:06 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2025-08-21 15:58 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21 16:18 ` Sang-Heon Jeon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABFDxMFy18rb3K0NYYKifsBVD8MoA=O5Aj=g+KS5gR1R9GCEdQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ekffu200098@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox