linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org, djbw@kernel.org,
	 mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Donghyeon Lee <asd142513@gmail.com>,
	 Munhui Chae <mochae@student.42seoul.kr>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] mm/fake-numa: fix under-allocation detection in uniform split
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 19:36:59 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABFDxMEx=GTSNc5kOr=aip=Mo6qBG9bdsTtQRcwLoyd7mAvYPA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416102558.575210-1-ekffu200098@gmail.com>

Hello,

On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 7:26 PM Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When split NUMA node uniformly, split_nodes_size_interleave_uniform()
> returns the next absolute node ID, not the number of nodes created.
>
> The existing under-allocation detection logic compares next absolute node
> ID (ret) and request count (n), which only works when nid starts at 0.
>
> For example, on a system with 2 physical NUMA nodes (node 0: 2GB, node
> 1: 128MB) and numa=fake=8U, 8 fake nodes are successfully created from
> node 0 and split_nodes_size_interleave_uniform() returns 8. For node 1,
> fake node nid starts at 8, but only 4 fake nodes are created due to
> current FAKE_NODE_MIN_SIZE being 32MB, and
> split_nodes_size_interleave_uniform() returns 12. By existing
> under-allocation detection logic, "ret < n" (12 < 8) is false, so the
> under-allocation will not be detected.
>
> Fix under-allocation detection logic to compare the number of actually
> created nodes (ret - nid) against the request count (n).
>
> Also, fix the outdated comment to match the actual return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Donghyeon Lee <asd142513@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Munhui Chae <mochae@student.42seoul.kr>
> Fixes: cc9aec03e58f ("x86/numa_emulation: Introduce uniform split capability") # 4.19
> ---
>  mm/numa_emulation.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/numa_emulation.c b/mm/numa_emulation.c
> index 703c8fa05048..c1d0a76aef64 100644
> --- a/mm/numa_emulation.c
> +++ b/mm/numa_emulation.c
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static u64 uniform_size(u64 max_addr, u64 base, u64 hole, int nr_nodes)
>   * Sets up fake nodes of `size' interleaved over physical nodes ranging from
>   * `addr' to `max_addr'.
>   *
> - * Returns zero on success or negative on error.
> + * Returns absolute node ID on success or negative on error.
>   */
>  static int __init split_nodes_size_interleave_uniform(struct numa_meminfo *ei,
>                                               struct numa_meminfo *pi,
> @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo, int numa_dist_cnt)
>                                         n, &pi.blk[0], nid);
>                         if (ret < 0)
>                                 break;
> -                       if (ret < n) {
> +                       if (ret - nid < n) {
>                                 pr_info("%s: phys: %d only got %d of %ld nodes, failing\n",
>                                                 __func__, i, ret, n);
>                                 ret = -1;
> --
> 2.43.0
>

The change log from the previous patch was accidentally omitted, so I
added it here.

---
Changes from v1 [1]
- Merge patchset into once.
- Change base from linux-next to mm-unstable

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260413154438.396031-1-ekffu200098@gmail.com/
---

Best Regards,
Sang-Heon Jeon


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-16 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-16 10:25 Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-04-16 10:36 ` Sang-Heon Jeon [this message]
2026-04-16 14:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-16 15:10   ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-04-16 14:36 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-16 15:25   ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-04-16 18:25     ` Donghyeon Lee
2026-04-16 18:45     ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABFDxMEx=GTSNc5kOr=aip=Mo6qBG9bdsTtQRcwLoyd7mAvYPA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ekffu200098@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=asd142513@gmail.com \
    --cc=djbw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mochae@student.42seoul.kr \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox