From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx202.postini.com [74.125.245.202]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 017996B0044 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:48:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by vcbfy7 with SMTP id fy7so1279182vcb.14 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:48:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120427181642.GG26595@google.com> References: <4F9A327A.6050409@jp.fujitsu.com> <20120427181642.GG26595@google.com> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:48:18 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7 v2] memcg: prevent failure in pre_destroy() From: Hiroyuki Kamezawa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Tejun Heo Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Linux Kernel , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "cgroups@vger.kernel.org" , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Frederic Weisbecker , Glauber Costa , Han Ying , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Andrew Morton On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:45:30PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: >> This is a v2 patch for preventing failure in memcg->pre_destroy(). >> With this patch, ->pre_destroy() will never return error code and >> users will not see warning at rmdir(). And this work will simplify >> memcg->pre_destroy(), largely. >> >> This patch is based on linux-next + hugetlb memory control patches. > > Ergh... can you please set up a git branch somewhere for review > purposes? > I'm sorry...I can't. (To do that, I need to pass many my company's check.) I'll repost all a week later, hugetlb tree will be seen in memcg-devel or linux-next. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org