From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
"Sang, Oliver" <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
Jay Patel <jaypatel@linux.ibm.com>,
Binder Makin <merimus@google.com>,
aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, tsahu@linux.ibm.com,
piyushs@linux.ibm.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com,
ying.huang@intel.com, lkp <lkp@intel.com>,
"oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev" <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] Revert "mm, slub: change percpu partial accounting from objects to pages"
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 00:11:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAB=+i9QmqJTCN4NZTxW3=hGLCN5hDH6wS2seFbZbU0A-PyMP0A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a94996f-b6f0-c427-eb1e-126bcb97930c@suse.cz>
[ +Cc Jesper - he might have an opinion on this. ]
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 7:34 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> Nit: I would change the subject from "Revert: " as it's not a revert
> exactly. If we can come up with a good subject that's not very long :)
Will do :)
> On 7/23/23 21:09, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > This is partial revert of commit b47291ef02b0 ("mm, slub: change percpu
> > partial accounting from objects to pages"). and full revert of commit
> > 662188c3a20e ("mm/slub: Simplify struct slab slabs field definition").
> >
> > While b47291ef02b0 prevents percpu partial slab list becoming too long,
> > it assumes that the order of slabs are always oo_order(s->oo).
> I think I've considered this possibility, but decided it's not important
> because if the system becomes memory pressured in a way that it can't
> allocate the oo_order() and has to fallback, we no longer care about
> accurate percpu caching, as we're unlikely having optimum performance anyway.
But it does not perform any direct reclamation/compaction to allocate
high order slabs,
so isn't it an easier condition to happen than that?
> > The current approach can surprisingly lower the number of objects cached
> > per cpu when it fails to allocate high order slabs. Instead of accounting
> > the number of slabs, change it back to accounting objects, but keep
> > the assumption that the slab is always half-full.
>
> That's a nice solution as that avoids converting the sysfs variable, so I
> wouldn't mind going that way even if I doubt the performance benefits in a
> memory pressured system.
> But maybe there's a concern that if the system is
> really memory pressured and has to fallback to smaller orders, before this
> patch it would keep fewer percpu partial slabs than after this patch, which
> would increase the pressure further and thus be counter-productive?
You mean SLUB needs to stop per-cpu caching when direct/or indirect
reclamation is desired?
> > With this change, the number of cached objects per cpu is not surprisingly
> > decreased even when it fails to allocate high order slabs. It still
> > prevents large inaccuracy because it does not account based on the
> > number of free objects when taking slabs.
> > ---
> > include/linux/slub_def.h | 2 --
> > mm/slab.h | 6 ++++++
> > mm/slub.c | 31 ++++++++++++-------------------
> > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/slub_def.h b/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > index deb90cf4bffb..589ff6a2a23f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > @@ -109,8 +109,6 @@ struct kmem_cache {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
> > /* Number of per cpu partial objects to keep around */
> > unsigned int cpu_partial;
> > - /* Number of per cpu partial slabs to keep around */
> > - unsigned int cpu_partial_slabs;
> > #endif
> > struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo;
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> > index 799a315695c6..be38a264df16 100644
> > --- a/mm/slab.h
> > +++ b/mm/slab.h
> > @@ -65,7 +65,13 @@ struct slab {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
> > struct {
> > struct slab *next;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > int slabs; /* Nr of slabs left */
> > + int pobjects; /* Approximate count */
> > +#else
> > + short int slabs;
> > + short int pobjects;
> > +#endif
> > };
> > #endif
> > };
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index f7940048138c..199d3d03d5b9 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -486,18 +486,7 @@ static inline unsigned int oo_objects(struct kmem_cache_order_objects x)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
> > static void slub_set_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, unsigned int nr_objects)
> > {
> > - unsigned int nr_slabs;
> > -
> > s->cpu_partial = nr_objects;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * We take the number of objects but actually limit the number of
> > - * slabs on the per cpu partial list, in order to limit excessive
> > - * growth of the list. For simplicity we assume that the slabs will
> > - * be half-full.
> > - */
> > - nr_slabs = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_objects * 2, oo_objects(s->oo));
> > - s->cpu_partial_slabs = nr_slabs;
> > }
> > #else
> > static inline void
> > @@ -2275,7 +2264,7 @@ static void *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
> > struct slab *slab, *slab2;
> > void *object = NULL;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > - unsigned int partial_slabs = 0;
> > + int objects_taken = 0;
> >
> > /*
> > * Racy check. If we mistakenly see no partial slabs then we
> > @@ -2312,11 +2301,11 @@ static void *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
> > } else {
> > put_cpu_partial(s, slab, 0);
> > stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_NODE);
> > - partial_slabs++;
> > + objects_taken += slab->objects / 2;
> > }
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
> > if (!kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s)
> > - || partial_slabs > s->cpu_partial_slabs / 2)
> > + || objects_taken > s->cpu_partial / 2)
> > break;
> > #else
> > break;
> > @@ -2699,13 +2688,14 @@ static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, int drain)
> > struct slab *slab_to_unfreeze = NULL;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int slabs = 0;
> > + int pobjects = 0;
> >
> > local_lock_irqsave(&s->cpu_slab->lock, flags);
> >
> > oldslab = this_cpu_read(s->cpu_slab->partial);
> >
> > if (oldslab) {
> > - if (drain && oldslab->slabs >= s->cpu_partial_slabs) {
> > + if (drain && oldslab->pobjects >= s->cpu_partial) {
> > /*
> > * Partial array is full. Move the existing set to the
> > * per node partial list. Postpone the actual unfreezing
> > @@ -2714,14 +2704,17 @@ static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, int drain)
> > slab_to_unfreeze = oldslab;
> > oldslab = NULL;
> > } else {
> > + pobjects = oldslab->pobjects;
> > slabs = oldslab->slabs;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > slabs++;
> > + pobjects += slab->objects / 2;
> >
> > slab->slabs = slabs;
> > slab->next = oldslab;
> > + slab->pobjects = pobjects;
> >
> > this_cpu_write(s->cpu_slab->partial, slab);
> >
> > @@ -5653,13 +5646,13 @@ static ssize_t slabs_cpu_partial_show(struct kmem_cache *s, char *buf)
> >
> > slab = slub_percpu_partial(per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab, cpu));
> >
> > - if (slab)
> > + if (slab) {
> > slabs += slab->slabs;
> > + objects += slab->objects;
> > + }
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > - /* Approximate half-full slabs, see slub_set_cpu_partial() */
> > - objects = (slabs * oo_objects(s->oo)) / 2;
> > len += sysfs_emit_at(buf, len, "%d(%d)", objects, slabs);
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
> > @@ -5669,7 +5662,7 @@ static ssize_t slabs_cpu_partial_show(struct kmem_cache *s, char *buf)
> > slab = slub_percpu_partial(per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab, cpu));
> > if (slab) {
> > slabs = READ_ONCE(slab->slabs);
> > - objects = (slabs * oo_objects(s->oo)) / 2;
> > + objects = READ_ONCE(slab->pobjects);
> > len += sysfs_emit_at(buf, len, " C%d=%d(%d)",
> > cpu, objects, slabs);
> > }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-21 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-23 19:09 [RFC 0/2] An attempt to improve SLUB on NUMA / under memory pressure Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-07-23 19:09 ` [RFC 1/2] Revert "mm, slub: change percpu partial accounting from objects to pages" Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-07-26 10:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-08-21 15:11 ` Hyeonggon Yoo [this message]
2023-07-23 19:09 ` [RFC 2/2] mm/slub: prefer NUMA locality over slight memory saving on NUMA machines Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-08-03 14:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-08-07 8:39 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-08-08 9:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-08-10 10:55 ` [RFC 0/2] An attempt to improve SLUB on NUMA / under memory pressure Jay Patel
2023-08-10 18:06 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-08-18 6:45 ` Jay Patel
2023-08-18 15:18 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAB=+i9QmqJTCN4NZTxW3=hGLCN5hDH6wS2seFbZbU0A-PyMP0A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jaypatel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=merimus@google.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=piyushs@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=tsahu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox