From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/slab: simplify SLAB_* flag handling
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 15:57:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAB=+i9QJsQEzSTf=LxY_Kuqm++2MZDXLL1eshngDZ5dAg5UzUQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250124164858.756425-1-kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 1:49 AM Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com> wrote:
>
> SLUB is the only remaining allocator. We can therefore get rid of
> the logic for allocator-specific flags:
>
> * Merge SLAB_CACHE_FLAGS into SLAB_CORE_FLAGS.
>
> * Remove CACHE_CREATE_MASK and instead mask out SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS if
> !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG. SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS is now defined
> unconditionally (no impact on existing code, which ignores it if
> !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG).
>
> * Define SLAB_FLAGS_PERMITTED in terms of SLAB_CORE_FLAGS and
> SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS (no functional change).
>
> While at it also remove misleading comments that suggest that
> multiple allocators are available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Hi Kevin,
This patch in general looks fine to me.
However, there are subtle changes that were not documented by the changelog.
SLUB currently does not _completely_ ignore debug flags even when
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=n. For example, calculate_sizes() relocate the free pointer
regardless of CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG.
I believe completely ignoring debug flags should be acceptable
when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=n, but this change should at least be documented
in the changelog.
Additionally, beyond what this patch currently does, we can remove several
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG #ifdefs in some functions (e.g., in calculate_sizes())
on top of this patch.
How does that sound to you?
Best,
Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-02 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-24 16:48 Kevin Brodsky
2025-02-02 6:57 ` Hyeonggon Yoo [this message]
2025-02-05 10:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05 12:11 ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-05 14:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAB=+i9QJsQEzSTf=LxY_Kuqm++2MZDXLL1eshngDZ5dAg5UzUQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox