* slab/for-next: 102 Tests: 102 Passed, 0 Failed
@ 2023-08-26 2:03 Hyeonggon Yoo
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Hyeonggon Yoo @ 2023-08-26 2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vlastimil Babka, Christoph Lameter, Linux Memory Management List,
David Rientjes, Pekka Enberg, Joonsoo Kim, Andrew Morton,
Aneesh Kumar K.V
Hi, this is the test result of slab/for-next testing,
targeting the testing of various SLUB configurations.
# Test Result
slab/for-next: 102 Tests: 102 Passed, 0 Failed
git repository:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/slab.git/
git branch: for-next
git commit: 66489e5487b7 ("Merge branch 'slab/for-6.6/random_kmalloc'
into slab/for-next")
This is Hyeonggon's project aimed at helping to reduce kernel bugs
during the development stage. Feel free to share any opinions; I will
make adjustments accordingly next time.
# Additional Information
At the moment the test case is only a boot test.
The configuration matrix is as follows:
# Note: SLAB is not tested
PREEMPT=PREEMPT_NONE,PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY,PREEMPT
DEBUG=e,d # enables KASAN, lockdep, DEBUG_VM*
SLUB_HARDENING=e,d # enables SLUB_FREELIST_*
SLUB_DEBUG_ON=e,d
SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT=e,d
SLUB_TINY=e,d
SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL=e,d
and the combination filter is:
!((SLUB_TINY == "e") && (SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT == "d" || SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
== "e" || SLUB_HARDENING == "e" || SLUB_DEBUG_ON == "e"))
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-08-26 2:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-08-26 2:03 slab/for-next: 102 Tests: 102 Passed, 0 Failed Hyeonggon Yoo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox