From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx198.postini.com [74.125.245.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 545C16B004F for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 01:52:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by vbih1 with SMTP id h1so847457vbi.26 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:52:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1324283611-18344-1-git-send-email-sumit.semwal@ti.com> <20111220193117.GD3883@phenom.ffwll.local> From: "Semwal, Sumit" Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:21:45 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC v3 0/2] Introduce DMA buffer sharing mechanism Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Rob Clark Cc: Dave Airlie , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, arnd@arndb.de, jesse.barker@linaro.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, t.stanislaws@samsung.com, patches@linaro.org, daniel@ffwll.ch On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Semwal, Sumit wrot= e: >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >>>> >>>> Hence for both patches: >>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter >>> >>> Yeah I'm with Daniel, I like this one, I can definitely build the drm >>> buffer sharing layer on top of this. >>> >>> How do we see this getting merged? I'm quite happy to push it to Linus >>> if we don't have an identified path, though it could go via a Linaro >>> tree as well. >>> >>> so feel free to add: >>> Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie >> Thanks Daniel and Dave! >> >> I guess we can start with staging for 3.3, and see how it shapes up. I >> will post the latest patch version pretty soon. > > not sure about staging, but could make sense to mark as experimental. Thanks, I will mark it experimental for the first version; we can remove that once it is more widely used and tested. > >> Arnd, Dave: do you have any preference on the path it takes to get >> merged? In my mind, Linaro tree might make more sense, but I would >> leave it upto you gentlemen. > > Looks like Dave is making some progress on drm usage of buffer sharing > between gpu's.. if that is ready to go in at the same time, it might > be a bit logistically simpler for him to put dmabuf in the same pull > req. =A0I don't have strong preference one way or another, so do what is > collectively simpler ;-) :) Right - I am quite happy for it to get merged in either ways :) > > BR, > -R Best regards, ~Sumit. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org