From: Yongfeng Wang <wangyongfeng5@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [RFC] Proposal: Kernel-supported mechanism for shared memory state cleanup on exit
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 09:07:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAqLnKL540gM6xLZonhSmhO+rWtWPO9_UJSfmsPWjVcTzf_mgQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi Andrew Morton,
I’m looking for your feedback on a gap in the current synchronization
primitives: the lack of a general, kernel-supported mechanism to clean
up user-space shared memory state (e.g., refcounts, ownership flags)
when a process exits unexpectedly (SIGKILL/crash).
The Problem: While robust_list handles mutexes and SEM_UNDO handles
System V semaphores, there is no generic way to perform simple,
reversible operations (like clearing a bit or decrementing a counter)
on arbitrary shared memory upon process death. User-space recovery is
often unreliable in crash scenarios.
The Idea: A syscall or prctl extension allowing a process to register
a limited number of "deferred actions" on shared memory addresses.
Target: Small, management-plane state.
Operations: Atomic write/add/clear.
Execution: Handled by the kernel during do_exit(), ensuring atomicity
even if the process is killed.
Questions:
Do you see this as a problem worth solving at the kernel level, or
should this remain strictly in user-space?
Are there fundamental architectural blockers (e.g., page fault
handling during do_exit) that make this impractical?
I have a more detailed technical draft ready if this is a direction
you’d consider.
Best regards,
Yongfeng Wang
reply other threads:[~2025-12-20 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAqLnKL540gM6xLZonhSmhO+rWtWPO9_UJSfmsPWjVcTzf_mgQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=wangyongfeng5@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox