From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-f72.google.com (mail-vk0-f72.google.com [209.85.213.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF536B0005 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 10:37:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-vk0-f72.google.com with SMTP id v6so285404273vkb.2 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w129si804939vkg.13.2016.07.01.07.37.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id u68so112952328vkf.2 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:37:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1467381733-18314-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <57767BCA.8010305@virtuozzo.com> From: Joonsoo Kim Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 23:37:17 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kasan/quarantine: fix bugs on qlist_move_cache() Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Andrey Ryabinin , Andrew Morton , Alexander Potapenko , kasan-dev , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , LKML , Joonsoo Kim 2016-07-01 23:20 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Vyukov : > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: >> >> >> On 07/01/2016 05:15 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: >>>> 2016-07-01 23:03 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Vyukov : >> >>>>>> + >>>>>> + if (obj_cache == cache) >>>>>> + qlist_put(to, qlink, cache->size); >>>>>> + else >>>>>> + qlist_put(from, qlink, cache->size); >>>>> >>>>> This line is wrong. If obj_cache != cache, object size != cache->size. >>>>> Quarantine contains objects of different sizes. >>>> >>>> You're right. 11 pm is not good time to work. :/ >>>> If it is fixed, the patch looks correct to you? >>>> I will fix it and send v4 on next week. >>> >>> >>> I don't see anything else wrong. But I need to see how you fix the size issue. >>> Performance of this operation is not particularly critical, so the >>> simpler the better. >> >> Is there any other way besides obvious: s/cache->size/obj_cache->size ? > > We can remember the original bytes, then subtract > num_objects_moved*cache->size from it and assign to from->bytes. I'd prefer s/cache->size/obj_cache->size. It looks simpler. If there is no objection, I will use it on v4. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org