From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f71.google.com (mail-it0-f71.google.com [209.85.214.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770C26B0007 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:47:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-f71.google.com with SMTP id v142-v6so1090783itb.1 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id u5-v6sor790273itc.58.2018.06.26.05.47.52 for (Google Transport Security); Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:47:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrey Konovalov Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:47:50 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Robin Murphy , Al Viro , Andrey Konovalov , Kees Cook , Kate Stewart , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Shuah Khan , Linux ARM , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management List , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, LKML Cc: Dmitry Vyukov , Kostya Serebryany , Evgeniy Stepanov , Lee Smith , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Jacob Bramley , Ruben Ayrapetyan , Chintan Pandya On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > arm64 has a feature called Top Byte Ignore, which allows to embed pointer > tags into the top byte of each pointer. Userspace programs (such as > HWASan, a memory debugging tool [1]) might use this feature and pass > tagged user pointers to the kernel through syscalls or other interfaces. > > This patch makes a few of the kernel interfaces accept tagged user > pointers. The kernel is already able to handle user faults with tagged > pointers and has the untagged_addr macro, which this patchset reuses. > > We're not trying to cover all possible ways the kernel accepts user > pointers in one patchset, so this one should be considered as a start. > > Thanks! > > [1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.html Hi! Is there anything I should do to move forward with this? I've received zero replies to this patch set (v3 and v4) over the last month. Thanks!