Re: [PATCH] kasan: fix clang compilation warning due to stack protector

[Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>]

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:56 PM Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 19:20, 'Andrey Konovalov' via kasan-dev
> <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> >
> > KASAN uses a single cc-option invocation to disable both conserve-stack
> > and stack-protector flags. The former flag is not present in Clang, which
> > causes cc-option to fail, and results in stack-protector being enabled.
> >
> > Fix by using separate cc-option calls for each flag. Also collect all
> > flags in a variable to avoid calling cc-option multiple times for
> > different files.
> >
> > Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
> > ---
>
> Thank you! I was about to send an almost identical patch, as I
> encountered this when using clang.
>
> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
>
> >  mm/kasan/Makefile | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/kasan/Makefile b/mm/kasan/Makefile
> > index de3121848ddf..bf6f7b1f6b18 100644
> > --- a/mm/kasan/Makefile
> > +++ b/mm/kasan/Makefile
> > @@ -15,14 +15,19 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_tags_report.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> >
> >  # Function splitter causes unnecessary splits in __asan_load1/__asan_store1
> >  # see: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63533
> > -CFLAGS_common.o := $(call cc-option, -fno-conserve-stack -fno-stack-protector) -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> > -CFLAGS_generic.o := $(call cc-option, -fno-conserve-stack -fno-stack-protector) -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> > -CFLAGS_generic_report.o := $(call cc-option, -fno-conserve-stack -fno-stack-protector) -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> > -CFLAGS_init.o := $(call cc-option, -fno-conserve-stack -fno-stack-protector) -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> > -CFLAGS_quarantine.o := $(call cc-option, -fno-conserve-stack -fno-stack-protector) -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> > -CFLAGS_report.o := $(call cc-option, -fno-conserve-stack -fno-stack-protector) -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> > -CFLAGS_tags.o := $(call cc-option, -fno-conserve-stack -fno-stack-protector) -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> > -CFLAGS_tags_report.o := $(call cc-option, -fno-conserve-stack -fno-stack-protector) -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
> > +CC_FLAGS_KASAN_CONFLICT := $(call cc-option, -fno-conserve-stack)
> > +CC_FLAGS_KASAN_CONFLICT += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
> > +# Disable branch tracing to avoid recursion.
> > +CC_FLAGS_KASAN_CONFLICT += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING
>
> Note that maybe CC_FLAGS_KASAN_RUNTIME could be a better name, because
> other flags added in future might not be conflict-related. But until
> that future, it doesn't really matter.

CC_FLAGS_KASAN_RUNTIME is a better name, sent v2, thanks!

>
> > +CFLAGS_common.o := $(CC_FLAGS_KASAN_CONFLICT)
> > +CFLAGS_generic.o := $(CC_FLAGS_KASAN_CONFLICT)
> > +CFLAGS_generic_report.o := $(CC_FLAGS_KASAN_CONFLICT)
> > +CFLAGS_init.o := $(CC_FLAGS_KASAN_CONFLICT)
> > +CFLAGS_quarantine.o := $(CC_FLAGS_KASAN_CONFLICT)
> > +CFLAGS_report.o := $(CC_FLAGS_KASAN_CONFLICT)
> > +CFLAGS_tags.o := $(CC_FLAGS_KASAN_CONFLICT)
> > +CFLAGS_tags_report.o := $(CC_FLAGS_KASAN_CONFLICT)
> >
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_KASAN) := common.o init.o report.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) += generic.o generic_report.o quarantine.o
> > --
> > 2.27.0.rc0.183.gde8f92d652-goog
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kasan-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/ced83584eec86a1a9ce264013cf6c0da5e0add6a.1590686292.git.andreyknvl%40google.com.