From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@arm.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/14] kasan: add a test for kmem_cache_alloc/free_bulk
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:32:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+zATEUJX+hm0m=jX9Z61CFRoMN3hmHuk8AL1dFy3W9KAg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNN5t0-dEHJUqKbT8eRQcj2epdiR5xbUkp=JR-Ka7jLM4A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:38 PM Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 at 17:22, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add a test for kmem_cache_alloc/free_bulk to make sure there are now
> > false-positives when these functions are used.
>
> s/now/no/ (but by itself doesn't necessarily demand a v3)
>
> > Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I2a8bf797aecf81baeac61380c567308f319e263d
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
> > ---
> > lib/test_kasan.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c
> > index 5e3d054e5b8c..d9f9a93922d5 100644
> > --- a/lib/test_kasan.c
> > +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c
> > @@ -479,10 +479,11 @@ static void kmem_cache_oob(struct kunit *test)
> > {
> > char *p;
> > size_t size = 200;
> > - struct kmem_cache *cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache",
> > - size, 0,
> > - 0, NULL);
> > + struct kmem_cache *cache;
> > +
> > + cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache", size, 0, 0, NULL);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, cache);
> > +
> > p = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!p) {
> > kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
> > @@ -491,11 +492,12 @@ static void kmem_cache_oob(struct kunit *test)
> > }
> >
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, *p = p[size + OOB_TAG_OFF]);
> > +
> > kmem_cache_free(cache, p);
> > kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> > }
> >
> > -static void memcg_accounted_kmem_cache(struct kunit *test)
> > +static void kmem_cache_accounted(struct kunit *test)
> > {
> > int i;
> > char *p;
> > @@ -522,6 +524,32 @@ static void memcg_accounted_kmem_cache(struct kunit *test)
> > kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> > }
> >
> > +static void kmem_cache_bulk(struct kunit *test)
> > +{
> > + struct kmem_cache *cache;
> > + size_t size = 200;
> > + size_t p_size = 10;
>
> s/p_size/ARRAY_SIZE(p)/
> ?
>
> > + char *p[10];
> > + bool ret;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache", size, 0, 0, NULL);
> > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, cache);
> > +
> > + ret = kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(cache, GFP_KERNEL, p_size, (void **)&p);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
> > + kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < p_size; i++)
> > + p[i][0] = p[i][size - 1] = 42;
> > +
> > + kmem_cache_free_bulk(cache, p_size, (void **)&p);
> > + kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> > +}
> > +
> > static char global_array[10];
> >
> > static void kasan_global_oob(struct kunit *test)
> > @@ -961,7 +989,8 @@ static struct kunit_case kasan_kunit_test_cases[] = {
> > KUNIT_CASE(kfree_via_page),
> > KUNIT_CASE(kfree_via_phys),
> > KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_oob),
> > - KUNIT_CASE(memcg_accounted_kmem_cache),
> > + KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_accounted),
> > + KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_bulk),
> > KUNIT_CASE(kasan_global_oob),
> > KUNIT_CASE(kasan_stack_oob),
> > KUNIT_CASE(kasan_alloca_oob_left),
> > --
> > 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog
> >
Will fix all in v3, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-13 16:21 [PATCH v2 00/14] kasan: HW_TAGS tests support and fixes Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] kasan: prefix global functions with kasan_ Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] kasan: clarify HW_TAGS impact on TBI Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] kasan: clean up comments in tests Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:24 ` Marco Elver
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] kasan: add macros to simplify checking test constraints Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:25 ` Marco Elver
2021-01-13 16:45 ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] kasan: add match-all tag tests Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:26 ` Marco Elver
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] kasan, arm64: allow using KUnit tests with HW_TAGS mode Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] kasan: rename CONFIG_TEST_KASAN_MODULE Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] kasan: add compiler barriers to KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:28 ` Marco Elver
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] kasan: adapt kmalloc_uaf2 test to HW_TAGS mode Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:31 ` Marco Elver
2021-01-13 16:32 ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] kasan: fix memory corruption in kasan_bitops_tags test Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] kasan: fix bug detection via ksize for HW_TAGS mode Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:54 ` Marco Elver
2021-01-14 17:58 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-14 18:01 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-14 19:56 ` Marco Elver
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] kasan: add proper page allocator tests Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] kasan: add a test for kmem_cache_alloc/free_bulk Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:37 ` Marco Elver
2021-01-14 15:32 ` Andrey Konovalov [this message]
2021-01-13 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] kasan: don't run tests when KASAN is not enabled Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 16:39 ` Marco Elver
2021-01-14 15:32 ` Andrey Konovalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAeHK+zATEUJX+hm0m=jX9Z61CFRoMN3hmHuk8AL1dFy3W9KAg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=Branislav.Rankov@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=eugenis@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox