linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,  Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	 dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	 Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
	 "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
	 Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@arm.com>,
	 Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	 Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	 Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	 Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com>,
	 Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	 Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
	Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@arm.com>,
	 Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,  enh <enh@google.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	 Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 02/16] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 19:09:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+z5nSOOaGfehETzznNcMq5E5U+Eb1rZE16UVsT8FWT0Vg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190611145720.GA63588@arrakis.emea.arm.com>

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:57 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 06:53:27PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 06:55:04PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > index e5d5f31c6d36..9164ecb5feca 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> > > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __range_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long si
> > >     return ret;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -#define access_ok(addr, size)      __range_ok(addr, size)
> > > +#define access_ok(addr, size)      __range_ok(untagged_addr(addr), size)
> >
> > I'm going to propose an opt-in method here (RFC for now). We can't have
> > a check in untagged_addr() since this is already used throughout the
> > kernel for both user and kernel addresses (khwasan) but we can add one
> > in __range_ok(). The same prctl() option will be used for controlling
> > the precise/imprecise mode of MTE later on. We can use a TIF_ flag here
> > assuming that this will be called early on and any cloned thread will
> > inherit this.
>
> Updated patch, inlining it below. Once we agreed on the approach, I
> think Andrey can insert in in this series, probably after patch 2. The
> differences from the one I posted yesterday:
>
> - renamed PR_* macros together with get/set variants and the possibility
>   to disable the relaxed ABI
>
> - sysctl option - /proc/sys/abi/tagged_addr to disable the ABI globally
>   (just the prctl() opt-in, tasks already using it won't be affected)
>
> And, of course, it needs more testing.

Sure, I'll add it to the series.

Should I drop access_ok() change from my patch, since yours just reverts it?

Thanks!

>
> ---------8<----------------
> From 7c624777a4e545522dec1b34e60f0229cb2bd59f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 13:03:38 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Introduce prctl() options to control the tagged user
>  addresses ABI
>
> It is not desirable to relax the ABI to allow tagged user addresses into
> the kernel indiscriminately. This patch introduces a prctl() interface
> for enabling or disabling the tagged ABI with a global sysctl control
> for preventing applications from enabling the relaxed ABI (meant for
> testing user-space prctl() return error checking without reconfiguring
> the kernel). The ABI properties are inherited by threads of the same
> application and fork()'ed children but cleared on execve().
>
> The PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL will be expanded in the future to handle
> MTE-specific settings like imprecise vs precise exceptions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h   |  6 +++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h     |  5 ++-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/process.c          | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/prctl.h           |  5 +++
>  kernel/sys.c                         | 16 +++++++
>  6 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> index fcd0e691b1ea..fee457456aa8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -307,6 +307,12 @@ extern void __init minsigstksz_setup(void);
>  /* PR_PAC_RESET_KEYS prctl */
>  #define PAC_RESET_KEYS(tsk, arg)       ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys(tsk, arg)
>
> +/* PR_TAGGED_ADDR prctl */
> +long set_tagged_addr_ctrl(unsigned long arg);
> +long get_tagged_addr_ctrl(void);
> +#define SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL(arg)      set_tagged_addr_ctrl(arg)
> +#define GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL()         get_tagged_addr_ctrl()
> +
>  /*
>   * For CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK
>   *
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index c285d1ce7186..7263d4c973ce 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk);
>  #define TIF_SVE                        23      /* Scalable Vector Extension in use */
>  #define TIF_SVE_VL_INHERIT     24      /* Inherit sve_vl_onexec across exec */
>  #define TIF_SSBD               25      /* Wants SSB mitigation */
> +#define TIF_TAGGED_ADDR                26
>
>  #define _TIF_SIGPENDING                (1 << TIF_SIGPENDING)
>  #define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED      (1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 9164ecb5feca..995b9ea11a89 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ static inline unsigned long __range_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long si
>  {
>         unsigned long ret, limit = current_thread_info()->addr_limit;
>
> +       if (test_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR))
> +               addr = untagged_addr(addr);
> +
>         __chk_user_ptr(addr);
>         asm volatile(
>         // A + B <= C + 1 for all A,B,C, in four easy steps:
> @@ -94,7 +97,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __range_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long si
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -#define access_ok(addr, size)  __range_ok(untagged_addr(addr), size)
> +#define access_ok(addr, size)  __range_ok(addr, size)
>  #define user_addr_max                  get_fs
>
>  #define _ASM_EXTABLE(from, to)                                         \
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> index 3767fb21a5b8..69d0be1fc708 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/stddef.h>
> +#include <linux/sysctl.h>
>  #include <linux/unistd.h>
>  #include <linux/user.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> @@ -323,6 +324,7 @@ void flush_thread(void)
>         fpsimd_flush_thread();
>         tls_thread_flush();
>         flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(current);
> +       clear_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR);
>  }
>
>  void release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task)
> @@ -552,3 +554,68 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void)
>
>         ptrauth_thread_init_user(current);
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Control the relaxed ABI allowing tagged user addresses into the kernel.
> + */
> +static unsigned int tagged_addr_prctl_allowed = 1;
> +
> +long set_tagged_addr_ctrl(unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +       if (!tagged_addr_prctl_allowed)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       if (is_compat_task())
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       if (arg & ~PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       if (arg & PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE)
> +               set_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR);
> +       else
> +               clear_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +long get_tagged_addr_ctrl(void)
> +{
> +       if (!tagged_addr_prctl_allowed)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       if (is_compat_task())
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       if (test_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR))
> +               return PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE;
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Global sysctl to disable the tagged user addresses support. This control
> + * only prevents the tagged address ABI enabling via prctl() and does not
> + * disable it for tasks that already opted in to the relaxed ABI.
> + */
> +static int zero;
> +static int one = 1;
> +
> +static struct ctl_table tagged_addr_sysctl_table[] = {
> +       {
> +               .procname       = "tagged_addr",
> +               .mode           = 0644,
> +               .data           = &tagged_addr_prctl_allowed,
> +               .maxlen         = sizeof(int),
> +               .proc_handler   = proc_dointvec_minmax,
> +               .extra1         = &zero,
> +               .extra2         = &one,
> +       },
> +       { }
> +};
> +
> +static int __init tagged_addr_init(void)
> +{
> +       if (!register_sysctl("abi", tagged_addr_sysctl_table))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +core_initcall(tagged_addr_init);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> index 094bb03b9cc2..2e927b3e9d6c 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> @@ -229,4 +229,9 @@ struct prctl_mm_map {
>  # define PR_PAC_APDBKEY                        (1UL << 3)
>  # define PR_PAC_APGAKEY                        (1UL << 4)
>
> +/* Tagged user address controls for arm64 */
> +#define PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL                55
> +#define PR_GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL                56
> +# define PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE         (1UL << 0)
> +
>  #endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> index 2969304c29fe..ec48396b4943 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -124,6 +124,12 @@
>  #ifndef PAC_RESET_KEYS
>  # define PAC_RESET_KEYS(a, b)  (-EINVAL)
>  #endif
> +#ifndef SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL
> +# define SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL(a)       (-EINVAL)
> +#endif
> +#ifndef GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL
> +# define GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL()                (-EINVAL)
> +#endif
>
>  /*
>   * this is where the system-wide overflow UID and GID are defined, for
> @@ -2492,6 +2498,16 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
>                         return -EINVAL;
>                 error = PAC_RESET_KEYS(me, arg2);
>                 break;
> +       case PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL:
> +               if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +               error = SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL(arg2);
> +               break;
> +       case PR_GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL:
> +               if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +               error = GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL();
> +               break;
>         default:
>                 error = -EINVAL;
>                 break;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-03 16:55 [PATCH v16 00/16] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 01/16] uaccess: add untagged_addr definition for other arches Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:02   ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:06     ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:24       ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:29         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-03 18:17           ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-04 11:45             ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 02/16] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:51   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 17:53   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 18:07     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 18:53       ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 20:36         ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 14:57     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:09       ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-06-12  9:32         ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:52           ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-06-11 17:09       ` Andrey Konovalov [this message]
2019-06-11 17:39         ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:03           ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:04             ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 03/16] lib, arm64: untag user pointers in strn*_user Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:48   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 20:06   ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 04/16] mm: untag user pointers in do_pages_move Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:49   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 20:18   ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-12 11:08     ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 05/16] arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:51   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 14:28   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 15:35     ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:44       ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:13         ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 06/16] mm, arm64: untag user pointers in mm/gup.c Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:59   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 07/16] mm, arm64: untag user pointers in get_vaddr_frames Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  4:00   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 14:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 08/16] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in copy_mount_options Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  4:02   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 14:38     ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:36       ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 09/16] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  4:03   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-12 10:45   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 10/16] drm/amdgpu, arm64: untag user pointers Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 11/16] drm/radeon, arm64: untag user pointers in radeon_gem_userptr_ioctl Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 12/16] IB, arm64: untag user pointers in ib_uverbs_(re)reg_mr() Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:46   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 12:18     ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 12:27       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 12:45         ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 13:02           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 13:09             ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:01               ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 13/16] media/v4l2-core, arm64: untag user pointers in videobuf_dma_contig_user_get Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:52   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 14/16] tee, arm64: untag user pointers in tee_shm_register Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-07  5:33   ` Jens Wiklander
2019-06-08  4:05   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 15/16] vfio/type1, arm64: untag user pointers in vaddr_get_pfn Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:58   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-12 10:38   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 16/16] selftests, arm64: add a selftest for passing tagged pointers to kernel Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:56   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 22:08     ` shuah
2019-06-11 15:01   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:18     ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:50       ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:14         ` Andrey Konovalov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAeHK+z5nSOOaGfehETzznNcMq5E5U+Eb1rZE16UVsT8FWT0Vg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=Jacob.Bramley@arm.com \
    --cc=Lee.Smith@arm.com \
    --cc=Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruben.Ayrapetyan@arm.com \
    --cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=enh@google.com \
    --cc=eugenis@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kcc@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yishaih@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox