From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f72.google.com (mail-wm0-f72.google.com [74.125.82.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C9D6B0038 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 08:45:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-f72.google.com with SMTP id t193so29114332wmt.4 for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:45:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-sor-f41.google.com (mail-sor-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id p11sor31298wmf.24.1969.12.31.16.00.00 for (Google Transport Security); Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:45:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2bbe7bdc-8842-8ec0-4b5a-6a8dce39216d@virtuozzo.com> References: <20170302134851.101218-1-andreyknvl@google.com> <20170302134851.101218-7-andreyknvl@google.com> <2bbe7bdc-8842-8ec0-4b5a-6a8dce39216d@virtuozzo.com> From: Andrey Konovalov Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:45:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] kasan: improve slab object description Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Alexander Potapenko , Dmitry Vyukov , kasan-dev , Linux Memory Management List , LKML On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > > > On 03/03/2017 04:52 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: >>> On 03/02/2017 04:48 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>>> Changes slab object description from: >>>> >>>> Object at ffff880068388540, in cache kmalloc-128 size: 128 >>>> >>>> to: >>>> >>>> The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff880068388540 >>>> which belongs to the cache kmalloc-128 of size 128 >>>> The buggy address is located 123 bytes inside of >>>> 128-byte region [ffff880068388540, ffff8800683885c0) >>>> >>>> Makes it more explanatory and adds information about relative offset >>>> of the accessed address to the start of the object. >>>> >>> >>> I don't think that this is an improvement. You replaced one simple line with a huge >>> and hard to parse text without giving any new/useful information. >>> Except maybe offset, it useful sometimes, so wouldn't mind adding it to description. >> Agreed. >> How about: >> =========== >> Access 123 bytes inside of 128-byte region [ffff880068388540, ffff8800683885c0) >> Object at ffff880068388540 belongs to the cache kmalloc-128 >> =========== >> ? >> > > I would just add the offset in the end: > Object at ffff880068388540, in cache kmalloc-128 size: 128 accessed at offset y Access can be inside or outside the object, so it's better to specifically say that. I think we can do (basically what Alexander suggested): Object at ffff880068388540 belongs to the cache kmalloc-128 of size 128 Access 123 bytes inside of 128-byte region [ffff880068388540, ffff8800683885c0) What do you think? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org