From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: untag object before slab end
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 01:26:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+wTcx+mk7ccLG-RtyO6X7TpYp1_BnuP8jBaS4KbGeb70w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1550092329.6911.35.camel@lca.pw>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:12 PM Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 11:31 +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:06 AM Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> wrote:
> > >
> > > get_freepointer() could return NULL if there is no more free objects in
> > > the slab. However, it could return a tagged pointer (like
> > > 0x2200000000000000) with KASAN_SW_TAGS which would escape the NULL
> > > object checking in check_valid_pointer() and trigger errors below, so
> > > untag the object before checking for a NULL object there.
> >
> > I think this solution is just masking the issue. get_freepointer()
> > shouldn't return tagged NULLs. Apparently when we save a freelist
> > pointer, the object where the pointer gets written is tagged
> > differently, than this same object when the pointer gets read. I found
> > one case where this happens (the last patch out my 5 patch series),
> > but apparently there are more.
>
> Well, the problem is that,
>
> __free_slab
> for_each_object(p, s, page_address(page) [1]
> check_object(s, page, p ...)
> get_freepointer(s, p)
>
> [1]: p += s->size
>
> page_address() tags the address using page_kasan_tag(page), so each "p" here has
> that tag.
Ah, I see what the issue is. With those 5 patches page_address()
should return 0xff-tagged pointer here, but when we set_freepointer()
the tag indeed might be different. OK, I think that patch that you
linked below is the better way to deal with this. I've added a
detailed comment to it and sent it.
Thanks!
>
> However, at beginning in allocate_slab(), it tags each object with a random tag,
> and then calls set_freepointer(s, p, NULL)
>
> As the result, get_freepointer() returns a tagged NULL because it never be able
> to obtain the original tag of the object anymore, and this calculation is now
> wrong.
>
> return (void *)((unsigned long)ptr ^ s->random ^ ptr_addr);
>
> This also explain why this patch also works, as it unifies the tags.
>
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=154955366113951&w=2
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 2:05 Qian Cai
2019-02-13 7:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2019-02-13 10:31 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-02-13 21:12 ` Qian Cai
2019-02-14 0:26 ` Andrey Konovalov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAeHK+wTcx+mk7ccLG-RtyO6X7TpYp1_BnuP8jBaS4KbGeb70w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox